HOW DO JUDGMENTS OF INTENTION (JOIS) DIFFER FROM JUDGMENTS OF LEARNING (JOLS)?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorWallsten, Thomas Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorScheck, Petra Anneen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPsychologyen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-02-04T08:22:34Z
dc.date.available2006-02-04T08:22:34Z
dc.date.issued2006-01-24en_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this research was to investigate whether metacognitive judgments for prospective memory (PM; also called Judgments of Intention - JOIs) differ from judgments of learning (JOLs). Specifically, this researcher tested whether JOIs exhibit the "delayed-JOL effect", in which JOLs made at a delay following study are more accurate predictors of performance than JOLs made immediately following study. Results from the first two experiments showed no delayed-JOI effect. In Experiments 3 - 5 a time-based paradigm was used to investigate whether the type of judgment prompt might explain this lack of delayed JOI effect. Results suggest that participants are able to make moderately accurate predictions of prospective memory (PM) performance and that delayed JOIs may be more accurate than immediate JOIs when prompted with a cue that does not include either the recognition nor recall target.en_US
dc.format.extent422330 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/3314
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledPsychology, Cognitiveen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledPsychology, Experimentalen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledmetacognitionen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledprospective memoryen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledJOLsen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledJOIsen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledjudgmentsen_US
dc.titleHOW DO JUDGMENTS OF INTENTION (JOIS) DIFFER FROM JUDGMENTS OF LEARNING (JOLS)?en_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
umi-umd-3148.pdf
Size:
412.43 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

UMD Theses and Dissertations
Psychology Theses and Dissertations