Exploring the variability in how educators attend to science classroom interactions
dc.contributor.advisor | Elby, Andrew | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Gillespie, Colleen | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Curriculum and Instruction | en_US |
dc.contributor.publisher | Digital Repository at the University of Maryland | en_US |
dc.contributor.publisher | University of Maryland (College Park, Md.) | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-10-02T05:33:04Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-10-02T05:33:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Many researchers assert educators must develop a shared instructional vision in order for schools to be effective. While this research tends to focus on educators' alignment around goals of science classrooms, I argue that we can't assume that educators agree on what they see when they look at science classrooms. In this dissertation, I explore the variability in what teachers and leaders notice in science classroom episodes and how they reason about what they notice. I ground my studies in real classroom practice: a videotaped lesson in the first study and a live classroom observation in the second. In Chapter 2, I discuss the importance of grounding discussions about teaching and learning in classroom artifacts, a commitment that motivates my dissertation: educators may have a shared vision when discussing teaching and learning in the abstract but disagree about whether that vision is being realized in a classroom. I then describe and analyze the video clip I used in my interviews, highlighting moments that I consider to be good teaching and learning. In Chapter 3, I present my first study, in which I showed this episode to 15 different science teachers, science instructional leaders, and principals. I found that participants attended to many different features in the episode, which led to significant disagreement about what is happening in the episode. Additionally, I found that these differences in attention corresponded to differences in how participants were framing the activity of watching the clip. In Chapter 4, I explore the attentional variability of one science instructional leader, Valerie, in multiple contexts. In addition to interviewing Valerie about the videotaped lesson, I also observed Valerie engage in an "observation cycle" with a teacher. Even though Valerie is quite skilled at attending to student thinking in some contexts, I found that Valerie's attention is strongly context-dependent and gets pulled away from students' scientific thinking when she uses a district mandated form. Finally, in Chapter 5 I summarize my findings and describe the implications my work has for both research and practice. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1903/14475 | |
dc.subject.pqcontrolled | Science education | en_US |
dc.subject.pquncontrolled | attending to student thinking | en_US |
dc.subject.pquncontrolled | instructional vision | en_US |
dc.subject.pquncontrolled | scientific inquiry | en_US |
dc.title | Exploring the variability in how educators attend to science classroom interactions | en_US |
dc.type | Dissertation | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Gillespie_umd_0117E_14413.pdf
- Size:
- 2.74 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format