Strengthening through adversity: The hormesis model in developmental psychopathology

dc.contributor.authorOshri, Assaf
dc.contributor.authorHoward, Cullin J.
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Linhao
dc.contributor.authorReck, Ava
dc.contributor.authorCui, Zehua
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Sihong
dc.contributor.authorDuprey, Erinn B.
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Avary I.
dc.contributor.authorAzarmehr, Rabeeh
dc.contributor.authorGeier, Charles F.
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-01T19:43:54Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background: Employing a developmental psychopathology framework, we tested the utility of the hormesis model in examining the strengthening of children and youth through limited levels of adversity in relation to internalizing and externalizing outcomes within a brain-by-development context. Methods: Analyzing data from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development study ( N = 11,878), we formed latent factors of threat, deprivation, and unpredictability. We examined linear and nonlinear associations between adversity dimensions and youth psychopathology symptoms and how change of resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) in the default mode network (DMN) from Time 1 to Time 5 moderates these associations. Results: A cubic association was found between threat and youth internalizing problems; low-to-moderate family conflict levels reduced these problems. Deprivation also displayed a cubic relation with youth externalizing problems, with moderate deprivation levels associated with fewer problems. Unpredictability linearly increased both problem types. Change in DMN rsFC significantly moderated the cubic link between threat levels and internalizing problems, with declining DMN rsFC levels from Time 1 to Time 5 facilitating hormesis. Hormetic effects peaked earlier, emphasizing the importance of sensitive periods and developmental timing of outcomes related to earlier experiences. Conclusions: Strengthening through limited environmental adversity is crucial for developing human resilience. Understanding this process requires considering both linear and nonlinear adversity-psychopathology associations. Testing individual differences by brain and developmental context will inform preventive intervention programming.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579424000427
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13016/xxru-alxl
dc.identifier.citationOshri, A., Howard, C. J., Zhang, L., Reck, A., Cui, Z., Liu, S., � Geier, C. F. (2024). Strengthening through adversity: The hormesis model in developmental psychopathology.�Development and Psychopathology,�36(5), 2390�2406. doi:10.1017/S0954579424000427
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/35692
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherDevelopment and Psychopathology
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectadversity
dc.subjectbrain-by-developmental context
dc.subjectdefault mode network (dmn)
dc.subjectequifinality
dc.subjecthormesis
dc.subjectmutlifinality
dc.subjectneuroplasticity resting-state functional connectivity
dc.subjectsteeling
dc.subjectresilience
dc.titleStrengthening through adversity: The hormesis model in developmental psychopathology
dc.typearticle
local.equitableAccessSubmissionYes

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Oshri_developmental-psychopathology_2024.pdf
Size:
3.74 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format