Show simple item record

On the True Cramer-Rao Lower Bound for the DA Joint Estimation of Carrier Phase and Timing Offsets

dc.contributor.advisorBaras, John S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJiang, Yiminen_US
dc.contributor.authorSun, F. W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBaras, John S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-05-23T10:10:07Z
dc.date.available2007-05-23T10:10:07Z
dc.date.issued2000en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/6171
dc.description.abstractThe Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB) plays a pivotal role in parameter estimation theory, such as timing, frequency and phase synchronization. Therefore, it receives considerable attention in the literature. This paper concerns the CRLB for data-aided (DA) timing and/or phase recovery, i.e. the parameter synchronization is aided by a training sequence known to the receiver. For DA parameter synchronization, the CRLB typically varies with the training sequence. This indicates that different training sequences offer fundamental different performance. Therefore, it is very important to be able to compute the CRLB for any particular training sequence to understand the fundamental limit that a particular training sequence has. However, in the literature, the closed-form CRLB for an arbitrary training sequence is not available. In principle, it is possible to use brute-force numerical approach to compute CRLB for any given training sequence. Such brute-force computation involves evaluation of derivatives numerically and matrix inversion. Besides the computational complexity, brute-force approach does not provide any insight on the interaction between training sequence and the resultant CRLB. In the literature, the widely cited close-form data-aided CRLB for timing and phase recovering was derived under the assumption that the training sequence is independently identical distributed (i.i.d.) and the length of the training sequence is sufficiently long. We found that the CRLB for a particular training sequence can be significantly lower than that with the long i.i.d. assumption. Therefore, the widely cited data-aided CRLB actually does not give the fundamental limit for a particular training sequence. In this manuscript, we derive a closed-form formula for data-aided CRLB for timing and phase synchronization with respect to arbitrary training sequence. The bound illustrates the close relation between the training sequence and the fundamental limit on timing and phase synchronization. This bound provides additional insights on the sequence design. 2000 IEEE International Conference on Communicationsen_US
dc.format.extent475069 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesISR; TR 2000-36en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCSHCN; TR 2000-14en_US
dc.subjectCramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB)en_US
dc.subjectDA parameter synchronizationen_US
dc.subjectindependently identical distributeden_US
dc.subjectGlobal Communication Systemsen_US
dc.titleOn the True Cramer-Rao Lower Bound for the DA Joint Estimation of Carrier Phase and Timing Offsetsen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
dc.contributor.departmentISRen_US
dc.contributor.departmentCSHCNen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record