Show simple item record

Planetary Seismology using Single-Station and Small-Aperture Arrays: Implications for Mars and Ocean Worlds

dc.contributor.advisorSchmerr, Nicholas Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarusiak, Angela Giulianoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-05T05:30:22Z
dc.date.available2020-10-05T05:30:22Z
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13016/jrd0-dofk
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/26478
dc.description.abstractStudying geophysical station deployment on Earth is essential preparation for future geophysical experiments elsewhere in the solar system. Here, I investigated how single-station seismometers and small-aperture seismic arrays in analog settings can quantify instrument capabilities, develop methodologies to detect and locate seismicity, and constrain internal structure. First, I used a single-station seismometer in Germany to study how the NASA InSight mission could constrain core depth. I showed that InSight could recover the Martian core within ±30 km if ≥ 3 events are located within an epicentral distance uncertainty of < ±1 degree. Increasing the number of detected events reduces core depth uncertainty, and higher signal-to-noise events will not affect core depth uncertainty or recovery rate. Next, I used environmental analogs in Earth's cryosphere to quantify how seismometer placement on a mock-lander would affect instrument performance and seismic science results for a future surface mission to an icy ocean world. If mock-lander instruments were unprotected from the wind, noise levels were 50 dB higher than those on the ground. However, once seismometers were shielded via burial, noise performances were similar to the ground-coupled seismometers, although spacecraft resonances were found at frequencies ~100 Hz. For icy ocean worlds lacking atmospheres, I showed that deck-mounted flight-candidate seismometers recorded ground motion comparably to surface-deployed instrumentation, with responses similar to terrestrial seismometers at frequencies > 0.1 Hz. Finally, I investigated seismicity detection capabilities of single-station and small-aperture seismic arrays. Small-aperture arrays were more effective at distinguishing low-frequency seismic events from noise and had fewer false positive events than a single-station. The Greenland site detected a higher percentage of teleseismic and regional tectonic events while the Gulkana Glacier, Alaska site observed more high frequency events. The high frequency seismicity was interpreted as originating from moulins, drainage events, icequakes, and rockfalls. Both sites had very high frequency events (> 100 Hz) that came from poles left in the field. These studies inform landing site selection criteria, such that there were trades between detecting local seismicity at the expense of seeing more distant events, and detecting larger teleseismic events that inform on deeper internal structure.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titlePlanetary Seismology using Single-Station and Small-Aperture Arrays: Implications for Mars and Ocean Worldsen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentGeologyen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledGeophysicsen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledPlanetologyen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledGeologyen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledAnalog Studiesen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledIcy Ocean Worldsen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledMarsen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledPlanetary Scienceen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledSeismologyen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledSingle-Stationen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record