The effect of mental stress on brain dynamics and performance related to attention control during a vigilance task: An electroencephalographic investigation

Abstract

Anxiety can increase distractibility and undermine the quality of psychomotor performance. Models of attention processing postulate that anxiety consumes limited executive resources necessary for maintaining goal-oriented, "top-down" attention control and suppressing stimulus-driven "bottom-up" distraction. Attention Control Theory (ACT) predicts that anxiety adversely affects the efficiency, and particularly inhibitory components of executive, frontally mediated top-down attention control. We used two approaches for examining this model. First, though attention affects synchrony among neural structures, information regarding how human oscillatory patterns (measured with electroencephalography, EEG) change as state anxiety increases is limited. Second, while anxiety affects the balance between top-down and bottom-up mechanisms, to our knowledge no one has yet measured anxiety's effect on attention using a neural measure of top-down control in conjunction with more traditional bottom-up measures of attention capture (e.g., the P3 event related potential, or ERP). Purpose: Study 1 examines the oscillatory patterns (spectral dynamics) of the cortex in order to investigate whether frontal regions exhibit patterns of reduced efficiency and altered networking with posterior regions during threat of shock. In order to assess the relationship between top-down and bottom-up attention dynamics, Study 2 uses the same threat protocol to measure attention-directed top-down modulation of sensory signaling (steady-state visual evoked potential, or ssVEP modulation) and of bottom-up attention capture by discrete targets and distractors (Event Related Potentials, ERPs). Results: The spectral analyses in Study 1 suggest decreased processing efficiency and decreased frontal networking (coherence) with more posterior regions as anxiety increased. Reduced coherence, however, could indicate either increased or decreased top-down focus; Study 2 provides more insight. Neural responses to task-relevant targets (ERPs) diminished as threat increased, while responses to task-irrelevant distractors remained unchanged. Contrary to what ACT would predict, we observed an increase in attention modulation of an ssVEP frequency associated with amplifying the task-relevant signal and no change in an ssVEP associated with inhibiting task-irrelevant stimuli. These findings suggest top-down attention control increased under threat, but was not enough to prevent degraded processing of task-relevant targets coincident with reduced efficiency on task performance. Implications and suggestions for refining ACT are discussed.