Institute for Systems Research

In this paper, we propose the idea of process planning for small batch manufacturing, i.e., we simultaneously consider multiple parts and exploit opportunities for sharing manufacturing resources such that the process plan will be optimized over the entire set of parts. In particular, we discuss a geometric algorithm for multiple part cutter selection in 2-1/2D milling operations.

We define the 2-1/2D milling operations as covering the target region without intersecting with the obstruction region. This definition allows us to handle the open edge problem. Based on this definition, we first discuss the lower and upper bond of cutter sizes that are feasible for given parts. Then we introduce the geometric algorithm to find the coverable area for a given cutter. Following that, we discuss the approach of considering cutter loading time and changing time in multiple cutter selection for multiple parts. We represent the cutter selection problem as shortest path problem and use Dijkstra's algorithm to solve it. By using this algorithm, a set of cutters is selected to achieve the optimum machining cost for multiple parts.

Our research illustrates the multiple parts process planning approach that is suitable for small batch manufacturing. At the same time, the algorithm given in this paper clarifies the 2-1/2D milling problem and can also help in cutter path planning problem.

In this paper, we give a geometric algorithm to find the optimal cutters for 2-1/2D milling operations. We define the 2-1/2D milling operations as covering the target region without intersecting with the obstruction region. This definition allows us to handle the open edge problem. Based on this definition, we introduced the offsetting and inverse-offsetting algorithm to find the coverable area for a given cutter. Following that, we represent the cutter selection problem as shortest path problem and discuss the lower and upper bond of cutter sizes that are feasible for given parts. The Dijkstra's algorithm is used to solve the problem and thus a set of cutters is selected in order to achieve the optimum machining cost.

We believe the selection of optimum cutter combination can not only save manufacturing time but also help automatic process planning.

1. We give a general definition of the problem as the task of covering a target region without interfering with anobstruction region. This definition encompasses the task of milling a general 2-D profile that includes bothopen and closed edges.

2. We discuss three alternative definitions of what it means for a cutter to be feasible, and explain which of thesedefinitions is most appropriate for the above problem.

3. We present a geometric algorithm for finding the maximal cutter for 2-D milling operations, and we show thatour algorithm is correct.

In this paper, we describe our current work towards the integration and enhancement of the capabilities of EDAPS and EXTRA. We integrate EXTRA's functionality with the initial design step of EDAPS. in the resultant system, the user, supported by an enhanced tradeoff analysis capability, can select and describe a promising preliminary design and process plan based on the analysis of a variety of alternatives from both an electrical and mechanical perspective. This preliminary design is then subjected top further analysis and refinement using existing EDAPS capabilities. In addition to the integration of these two systems, specific new functions have been developed, including tradeoff analysis over a much broader set of criteria, and the ability of the tradeoff module to query the process planner to determine costs of individual options.

The fact that deleted-condition interactions are easy and deadlocks are difficult is rather surprising, for one of the primary roles of the blocks world in the planning literature has been to provide examples of deleted- condition interactions such as creative destruction and Sussman's anomaly. This suggests that a good topic for future research might be to investigate how easily such interactions can be handled in other planning domains.