Art Criticism Through Storytelling

dc.contributor.advisorHendricks, Susanen_US
dc.contributor.authorSchappelle, Laura Scotten_US
dc.contributor.departmentCurriculum and Instructionen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-06-14T06:05:14Z
dc.date.available2006-06-14T06:05:14Z
dc.date.issued2006-05-12en_US
dc.description.abstractThis Action Research study focused on the use of storytelling as a means of critically analyzing a work of art. The participants in this study were elementary students in the Fifth Grade. The participants wrote a story and verbally told a story in response to looking at a work of art. The researcher then compared the written and oral forms of communication to determine which yielded better results in terms of producing an effective art criticism. These responses will be compared to Feldman's Model, a popular approach of art criticism. The primary goal of the study was to see whether storytelling would prove to be an effective format for an art criticism. The secondary goal of this study was to analyze the difference between written and verbal forms of communication.en_US
dc.format.extent1484880 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/3587
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledEducation, Arten_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledArt Criticismen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledStorytellingen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledFeldmanen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledDiscipline Based Art Educationen_US
dc.titleArt Criticism Through Storytellingen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
umi-umd-3429.pdf
Size:
1.42 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format