MEGAPOOLS: VEGETATION DIEBACK AND RESTORATION POTENTIAL OF A DITCHED COASTAL SALT MARSH

dc.contributor.advisorBaldwin, Andrew Hen_US
dc.contributor.authorStahl, Katherine A.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMarine-Estuarine-Environmental Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-14T06:49:41Z
dc.date.available2024-02-14T06:49:41Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.description.abstractIn many ditched coastal salt marshes, megapools, or large ponded areas of vegetation dieback,have formed. In combination with sea level rise, this interior marsh loss can decrease wildlife habitat suitability, resilience to storms, and other ecosystem services. However, mechanisms of megapool formation are poorly understood, hampering restoration efforts. Here, we explored differences in environmental characteristics between megapools in different stages of formation (Fully Formed, Partially Formed and Nonformed/Control) and between Elevations within megapools (High, Medium, Low). Using IRIS Films (Indicator of Reduction in Soil), we found that Fully Formed megapools had higher sulfide concentrations than Partially formed, which in turn were greater than Nonformed megapools. We additionally found that lower elevations correlated with higher sulfides, lower plant coverage, lower belowground biomass, lower Carbon Density, and predicted megapool type. We noted that in terms of elevation, vegetative cover, and biomass, Nonformed and Partially formed were more similar as were High and Medium elevations. Whereas in terms of soil characteristics, Fully Formed and Partially formed were more similar as were Medium and Low Elevations. To combat megapools and dieback, we will assess the effectiveness of two restoration techniques, the first of which is assessing the survival and growth of plantings at different spacings, elevations, and megapool formation levels. We found survival and growth was higher in Partially formed megapools than Fully formed, and no impact by spacing or elevation. Our second restoration technique is runnels, or 15” channels that reconnect megapools to ditches, which were installed in January of 2023. The data collected above will act as baseline data, repeated again. These baseline results support a close relationship between pool stages of formation, carbon storage, elevation, vegetation health, biomass production, and sulfide levels (Graphical Abstract).en_US
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13016/txiv-cnrd
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/31766
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledEcologyen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledEnvironmental scienceen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledCoastalen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledMarshen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledMegapoolen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledRestorationen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledRunnelen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledWetlandsen_US
dc.titleMEGAPOOLS: VEGETATION DIEBACK AND RESTORATION POTENTIAL OF A DITCHED COASTAL SALT MARSHen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Stahl_umd_0117N_23911.pdf
Size:
28.05 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
(RESTRICTED ACCESS)