Reciprocal Relations Between Perceived Stress and Literacy Achievement in School-Age Children Over Time

dc.contributor.advisorO'Neal, Colleen Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorBabaturk, Leylaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentCounseling and Personnel Servicesen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-20T05:30:20Z
dc.date.available2022-09-20T05:30:20Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.description.abstractStress has a negative impact on academic achievement, but it is unclear whether achievement impacts stress. Most stress research utilizes a unidirectional design (e.g., stress affects achievement). Recent research has begun to examine cross-lagged models in which social-emotional variables and achievement affect one another; however, associations have typically been found at the between-person level of analysis. In contrast, within-person effects may provide information about the state- or trait-like nature of an individual’s, versus a group’s (between-person effects), growth over time. This short-term longitudinal study examined the direction of relations between the social-emotional variable of perceived stress and literacy among diverse elementary students. In addition, this study was the first to examine stress-literacy achievement relations at both the between-person and within-person levels. Participants included upper elementary students (N = 397; Mage = 9.61; 56% female; 57% Dual Language Learners; 12% Black, 6% Asian, 30% Latinx, 7% Multiracial; 43% White) from three schools. Measures were collected at three timepoints over four months, including student-reported perceived stress (two factors: stress-coping and stress-distress) and a literacy achievement performance task (Test of Silent Reading Efficiency and Comprehension, TOSREC). Latent variable path analyses revealed that stress-coping was a significant predictor of later literacy achievement. Reverse relations also held true with literacy achievement as a negative predictor of later Time 2 stress-distress, and a positive predictor of later Time 2 coping, when previous stress was not a control. In contrast, no significant stress-literacy achievement relations (i.e., direct, reverse, or cross-lagged) were found when a latent curve model was used at the residual level, which suggests that the relations between stress and literacy achievement were more trait-based than state-based for students across a short period of time. Results are discussed in the context of reciprocal and between-person versus within-person mechanisms of change between stress and literacy achievement.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13016/slnl-9cno
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/29195
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledEducational psychologyen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledcopingen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledcross-lagged effectsen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledliteracy achievementen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledperceived stressen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledreciprocalen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledwithin-person effectsen_US
dc.titleReciprocal Relations Between Perceived Stress and Literacy Achievement in School-Age Children Over Timeen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Babaturk_umd_0117E_22063.pdf
Size:
1.02 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format