Integrating Environmental Justice and Social-Ecological Resilience for Successful Adaptation to Climate Change: Lessons from African American Communities on the Eastern Shore of the Chesapeake Bay

dc.contributor.advisorPaolisso, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorHesed, Christine Danielle Milleren_US
dc.contributor.departmentAnthropologyen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-03T05:35:01Z
dc.date.available2016-09-03T05:35:01Z
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.description.abstractThis research concerns the conceptual and empirical relationship between environmental justice and social-ecological resilience as it relates to climate change vulnerability and adaptation. Two primary questions guided this work. First, what is the level of resilience and adaptive capacity for social-ecological systems that are characterized by environmental injustice in the face of climate change? And second, what is the role of an environmental justice approach in developing adaptation policies that will promote social-ecological resilience? These questions were investigated in three African American communities that are particularly vulnerable to flooding from sea-level rise on the Eastern Shore of the Chesapeake Bay. Using qualitative and quantitative methods, I found that in all three communities, religious faith and the church, rootedness in the landscape, and race relations were highly salient to community experience. The degree to which these common aspects of the communities have imparted adaptive capacity has changed over time. Importantly, a given social-ecological factor does not have the same effect on vulnerability in all communities; however, in all communities political isolation decreases adaptive capacity and increases vulnerability. This political isolation is at least partly due to procedural injustice, which occurs for a number of interrelated reasons. This research further revealed that while all stakeholders (policymakers, environmentalists, and African American community members) generally agree that justice needs to be increased on the Eastern Shore, stakeholder groups disagree about what a justice approach to adaptation would look like. When brought together at a workshop, however, these stakeholders were able to identify numerous challenges and opportunities for increasing justice. Resilience was assessed by the presence of four resilience factors: living with uncertainty, nurturing diversity, combining different types of knowledge, and creating opportunities for self-organization. Overall, these communities seem to have low resilience; however, there is potential for resilience to increase. Finally, I argue that the use of resilience theory for environmental justice communities is limited by the great breadth and depth of knowledge required to evaluate the state of the social-ecological system, the complexities of simultaneously promoting resilience at both the regional and local scale, and the lack of attention to issues of justice.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13016/M29505
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/18549
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledCultural anthropologyen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledClimate changeen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledEnvironmental justiceen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledadaptationen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledafrican americanen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledclimate changeen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledenvironmental justiceen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledresilienceen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledvulnerabilityen_US
dc.titleIntegrating Environmental Justice and Social-Ecological Resilience for Successful Adaptation to Climate Change: Lessons from African American Communities on the Eastern Shore of the Chesapeake Bayen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Hesed_umd_0117E_17285.pdf
Size:
2.35 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format