THE EFFECT OF PRACTICE WITH TEST ON THE RELATIVE ACCURACY OF JUDGMENTS OF LEARNING

dc.contributor.advisorWallsten, Thomas S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJang, Yoonheeen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPsychologyen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-06-14T05:38:32Z
dc.date.available2006-06-14T05:38:32Z
dc.date.issued2006-04-11en_US
dc.description.abstractTo investigate what aspects of practice increase the relative accuracy of judgments of learning (JOLs), this study manipulated both JOL timing and type of practice. Three experiments examined the hypotheses that practice with test but not without test improves the relative accuracy of JOLs, and that a similar process mediates the effects of both delay and practice. The results of the experiments revealed that practice without test does not increase the relative accuracy of JOLs, but practice with test does, and that this advantage is different from the advantage caused by delay. These results are discussed in the context of the retrieval hypothesis of memory as well as theories of JOLs.en_US
dc.format.extent442366 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/3398
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledPsychology, Cognitiveen_US
dc.titleTHE EFFECT OF PRACTICE WITH TEST ON THE RELATIVE ACCURACY OF JUDGMENTS OF LEARNINGen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
umi-umd-3211.pdf
Size:
432 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format