Image Reconstruction Techniques and Measure of Quality: Classical vs.Modern Approaches

dc.contributor.advisorHealy, Dennis Men_US
dc.contributor.authorUrimi, Lakshmien_US
dc.contributor.departmentApplied Mathematics and Scientific Computationen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2005-10-11T10:09:53Z
dc.date.available2005-10-11T10:09:53Z
dc.date.issued2005-07-25en_US
dc.description.abstractMathematical methods are of central importance in the new technologies of image reconstruction. Some of the most important procedures are classified as Back-projection, Filtered Back-projection and iterative reconstruction techniques. Back- projection played an important historical role but is no longer used because of sizable artifacts. Analytical methods like Filtered Back projection excel in speed and accuracy when a large number ofprojections are available. These are extensively used in x-ray imaging. Algebraic Reconstruction Technique(ART) is more attractive when the number of views is limited and when noise is significant. For these reasons, iterative methods are widely used in imaging. Two slight variants of ART are SIRT (Simultaneous Iterative reconstruction Techniques) and SART (Simultaneous ART).A modern method of image reconstruction technique is Fast Slant Slack(FSS). This method is rapidly computable, algebraically exact, geometrically faithful and invertible. A new software known as beamlab is used for FSS image reconstruction. All these reconstruction techniques are explored in this work. Also, various tasks are performed to measure the immunity to noise and quality of the images using PSNR, MSE and Universal Image Quality Index.en_US
dc.format.extent1300615 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/2887
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledMathematicsen_US
dc.titleImage Reconstruction Techniques and Measure of Quality: Classical vs.Modern Approachesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
umi-umd-2667.pdf
Size:
1.24 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format