The place of race in past and present: Student and state narratives of race in U.S. History
dc.contributor.advisor | Brown, Tara M | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Justine Hwei Chi | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Education Policy, and Leadership | en_US |
dc.contributor.publisher | Digital Repository at the University of Maryland | en_US |
dc.contributor.publisher | University of Maryland (College Park, Md.) | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-13T05:32:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-07-13T05:32:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This three-study dissertation addresses the broader question of identifying a collective memory of race in the Northern United States. The studies are conceptually linked by a critical race perspective and are distinct in research focus, methods, and findings. In the first study, I examined how 128 students from two New England states represented their understandings of the history of enslavement in the United States. I used inductive and deductive approaches to investigate how they connected this history to race and notions of national progress. In the second study, I used document analysis to investigate the representation of people of color in New York’s state standards for 11th grade U.S. history. I found that less than one-third of standards cited people of color, and the majority of such standards cited them alongside White people. This practice of exclusionary grouping reinforced Whiteness as normative by implying a essentialist view of race and ethnicity. In the third study, I employed discourse analysis to examine the representation of race in the New York U.S. history curricular framework and in the policy context of its intended use. I found that policy defining the purpose of social studies promoted nationalist and race-evasive discourses. Through strategic periodization, the curriculum segregated explicit references to race into an “alternate timeline,” whose narrative arc strongly implied racial progress. Moreover, I found that the selectively ahistorical use of the word “American” was used to mark groups as non-White. Ultimately, the state’s manipulation of time and language functioned to preserve discourses of national progress and U.S. moral exceptionalism and to suppress the study of race in history. | en_US |
dc.identifier | https://doi.org/10.13016/wmrq-scsu | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1903/27356 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.subject.pqcontrolled | Educational sociology | en_US |
dc.subject.pqcontrolled | Social sciences education | en_US |
dc.subject.pquncontrolled | History Education | en_US |
dc.subject.pquncontrolled | Race | en_US |
dc.subject.pquncontrolled | State Standards | en_US |
dc.subject.pquncontrolled | U.S. History | en_US |
dc.title | The place of race in past and present: Student and state narratives of race in U.S. History | en_US |
dc.type | Dissertation | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- Lee_umd_0117E_21487.pdf
- Size:
- 1.9 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
(RESTRICTED ACCESS)