THE QUEST FOR I-LITERACY: IDENTIFYING AND ADDRESSING GAPS IN INFORMATION LITERACY EDUCATION IN INFORMATION SCIENCE UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMS

dc.contributor.advisorJaeger, Paulen_US
dc.contributor.authorDouglass, Courtney L.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentLibrary & Information Servicesen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-01T06:38:07Z
dc.date.available2023-02-01T06:38:07Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.description.abstractInformation scholars, educators and librarians have grappled with defining the concept of information literacy for decades – at least as far back as the 1970’s – with the most prominent common thread being as a set of skills. In pedagogy and practice, what higher education currently calls information literacy is delivered more akin to research skills or the ability to effectively conduct and share research in its myriad forms. It is problematic that for so long the emphasis on research and academic skills has wholly devalued those sources deemed non-traditional by academic measures, including popular sources, pop-culture entertainment, and the power of observation. Ironically this emphasis on academic research skills diminishes the extreme societal impact non-traditional sources and stories have had throughout the information age in which we currently find ourselves. In this dissertation, I provide a curriculum map for the required courses in five Undergraduate Information Science Programs, with the dual purpose of aligning instruction practices and gaps with the aforementioned impacts as they determine what information literacy should mean, and encouraging iSchools to adopt and promote a socially constructed model of information literacy, which I am terming i-Literacy. This study demonstrates how iSchool undergraduate programs emphasize understanding that different information mediums are required based on audience, user needs, and the information problem, but may not highlight social and civic responsibility with information use and sharing. The map also shows a strong alignment between the seemingly antiquated ‘Bibliographic Instruction’ practices from the 1980’s and 90’s, and the current pedagogy based on the ACRL Framework.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13016/zoem-i4wt
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/29584
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledInformation scienceen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledHigher educationen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledLibrary scienceen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledcurriculumen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledequityen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledinclusionen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledliteracyen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledmappingen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledpedagogyen_US
dc.titleTHE QUEST FOR I-LITERACY: IDENTIFYING AND ADDRESSING GAPS IN INFORMATION LITERACY EDUCATION IN INFORMATION SCIENCE UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMSen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Douglass_umd_0117E_22933.pdf
Size:
1.36 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format