A comparison of lexical access in adults who do and do not stutter

dc.contributor.advisorBernstein Ratner, Nanen_US
dc.contributor.authorHowell, Timothy Andrewen_US
dc.contributor.departmentHearing and Speech Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-09T06:36:29Z
dc.date.available2016-02-09T06:36:29Z
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.description.abstractPrevious work has postulated that a deficit in lexicalization may be an underlying cause of a stuttering disorder (Prins, Main, & Wampler, 1997; Wingate, 1988). This study investigates the time course of lexicalization of nouns and verbs in adults who stutter. A generalized phoneme monitoring (GPM) paradigm was used. Both populations showed a significant effect of word class (verbs yielded slower and less accurate monitoring than nouns), as well as phoneme position (word medial/final phonemes yielded slower and less accurate monitoring than word initial phonemes). Few significant differences were found between groups, although the experimental group showed poorer performance in all conditions, with the exception of null trials, where the experimental group actually out-performed the control group. The trends provide some level of support for the notion that people who stutter have a deficit in lexicalization, although the effect is mitigated by the lack of significance.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13016/M2ZQ6V
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/17385
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledSpeech therapyen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledlexicalizationen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledphoneme monitoringen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledstutteren_US
dc.titleA comparison of lexical access in adults who do and do not stutteren_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Howell_umd_0117N_16808.pdf
Size:
660.79 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format