Portraiture and Politics in New York City, 1790-1825: Stuart, Vanderlyn, Trumbull, and Jarvis

dc.contributor.advisorPromey, Sally M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZygmont, Bryan Johnen_US
dc.contributor.departmentArt History and Archaeologyen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.description.abstractFour prominent portraitists were active in New York City between 1790 and 1825: Gilbert Stuart, John Vanderlyn, John Trumbull, and John Wesley Jarvis. Despite working in the same geographic location, these four artists received different artistic training, developed distinct aesthetics, and often worked for distinct groups of patrons. Upon returning to the United States in 1793 Stuart quickly established himself as the preeminent portraitist in New York City. This coincided with a moment of particular political harmony in the United States, a harmony that was broken by the vitriolic debates over the ratification of the Jay Treaty in 1795. Although Vanderlyn briefly studied with Stuart, Vanderlyn received most of his training in Paris in the studio of Vincent, a prominent French neoclassicist. When Vanderlyn returned to New York City, Democratic-Republicans--politicians who wished to tie the diplomatic future of the United States to France--quickly embraced Vanderlyn's decidedly French aesthetic. This artistic style is characterized by an emphasis on linearity, a muted use of color, and compositions in which the artist places compositional focus on the sitter rather than objects around him. Conversely, Federalists who wished to further tie America to Great Britain preferred Trumbull and his English style: the energetic brushstrokes, colorful palette, and compositions that often contained ancillary elements that allude to the sitter's occupation, education, and wealth. In contrast to both Vanderlyn and Trumbull, Jarvis did not received European training. As a result, he developed an aesthetic that was quickly embraced by individuals who did not wish their portrait express political alignment. Indeed, this political neutrality--both social and stylistic--was one of the reasons members of the military preferred Jarvis over his politically inclined competitors.en_US
dc.format.extent1756930 bytes
dc.subject.pqcontrolledArt Historyen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledHistory, United Statesen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledNew York Cityen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledGilbert Stuarten_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledJohn Trumbullen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledJohn Wesley Jarvisen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledJohn Vandelrynen_US
dc.titlePortraiture and Politics in New York City, 1790-1825: Stuart, Vanderlyn, Trumbull, and Jarvisen_US
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
1.68 MB
Adobe Portable Document Format