Fish Bioacoustics: From Basic Science to Policy
| dc.contributor.advisor | Bailey, Helen R | en_US |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Popper, Arthur N | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Colbert, Benjamin | en_US |
| dc.contributor.department | Marine-Estuarine-Environmental Sciences | en_US |
| dc.contributor.publisher | Digital Repository at the University of Maryland | en_US |
| dc.contributor.publisher | University of Maryland (College Park, Md.) | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-28T05:53:31Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-06-28T05:53:31Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Sound is critically important to fishes. Sound is used to communicate with conspecifics, to detect predators and prey, or to otherwise understand the world around them. Within this dissertation, I used a variety of methods to investigate multiple aspects of fish bioacoustics, including hearing, hearing in noise, the effects of anthropogenic sound, and the morphology of peripheral auditory structures.In Chapter 2, I reviewed international policy on the regulation of underwater sound and the effects of underwater sound on marine and aquatic habitats. I found that while there are increasing efforts to regulate underwater noise, the policy efforts are hampered by a lack of quantifiable metrics associated with impacts of anthropogenic sound in aquatic habitats and species. In Chapter 3, I measured auditory sensitivity of cyprinids using physiological methods. Auditory evoked potentials, a physiological measure of auditory sensitivity, have been used in previous studies to measure hearing sensitivity. However, while physiological methods have their place, they are measuring the sensitivity of the ear rather than the entirety of the auditory pathway. Therefore, I further measured hearing sensitivity of goldfish using behavioral methods that encompass the full auditory pathway. I found that physiological methods tend to underestimate actual hearing sensitivity at frequencies less than 1000 Hz. In Chapter 4, I investigated cyprinid hearing in noise, using both physiological and behavioral measures. Critical ratios were measured for four species of carp and goldfish using auditory evoked potentials. Behavioral methods were also used to measure critical ratios for goldfish. These data represent the first measurements of critical ratios for carp and the first comparative analysis between critical ratios measured using both physiology and behavior. I found that critical ratios for carp increase by as much as 25 dB between 300 Hz and 1500 Hz. I also found that physiological methods likely overestimate actual critical ratios for fish. In Chapter 5, I used micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and three dimensional geometric morphometrics to compare the peripheral auditory structures of three species of carp. Three dimensional models of the tripus ossicle, the posterior most Weberian ossicle, and the sagitta otolith were created and the shape of these structures for silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix), bighead carp (H. noblis), and grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) quantified and contrasted. I found that the shape of the tripus differed between the Hypophthalmichthys genus (i.e., silver and bighead carp) and Ctenopharyngodon (grass carp), demonstrating a possible phylogenetic signal in the shape of the Weberian ossicles. In Chapter 6, I studied the response of wild oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) to underwater radiated noise from boats. I used passive acoustic monitoring to record toadfish vocalizations and vessel passages in the Chesapeake Bay, U.S.A. The effect of acute vessel passage was determined by comparing the number of calls after a vessel had passed to a control period. The effect of both aggregate vessel passage over an hour and environmental variables were investigated using generalized additive mixed models. I found that there was no significant effect on toadfish call rates from acute vessel passage but when vessel generated sound was higher over an hour long period (i.e., aggregate effect), call rate declined. | en_US |
| dc.identifier | https://doi.org/10.13016/g5wx-vgik | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1903/32823 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.subject.pqcontrolled | Ecology | en_US |
| dc.subject.pqcontrolled | Acoustics | en_US |
| dc.subject.pquncontrolled | Fish | en_US |
| dc.subject.pquncontrolled | Hearing | en_US |
| dc.subject.pquncontrolled | Underwater noise | en_US |
| dc.title | Fish Bioacoustics: From Basic Science to Policy | en_US |
| dc.type | Dissertation | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- Colbert_umd_0117E_24086.pdf
- Size:
- 1.76 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format