Hygroscopicity of Different Types of Aerosol Particles: Case Studies Using Multi-Instrument Data in Megacity Beijing, China
dc.contributor.author | Wu, Tong | |
dc.contributor.author | Li, Zhanqing | |
dc.contributor.author | Chen, Jun | |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Yuying | |
dc.contributor.author | Wu, Hao | |
dc.contributor.author | Jin, Xiao'ai | |
dc.contributor.author | Liang, Chen | |
dc.contributor.author | Li, Shangze | |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Wei | |
dc.contributor.author | Cribb, Maureen | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-11-09T20:28:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-09T20:28:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-03-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | Water uptake by aerosol particles alters its light-scattering characteristics significantly. However, the hygroscopicities of different aerosol particles are not the same due to their different chemical and physical properties. Such differences are explored by making use of extensive measurements concerning aerosol optical and microphysical properties made during a field experiment from December 2018 to March 2019 in Beijing. The aerosol hygroscopic growth was captured by the aerosol optical characteristics obtained from micropulse lidar, aerosol chemical composition, and aerosol particle size distribution information from ground monitoring, together with conventional meteorological measurements. Aerosol hygroscopicity behaves rather distinctly for mineral dust coarse-mode aerosol (Case I) and non-dust fine-mode aerosol (Case II) in terms of the hygroscopic enhancement factor, 𝑓𝛽(𝑅𝐻,𝜆532), calculated for the same humidity range. The two types of aerosols were identified by applying the polarization lidar photometer networking method (POLIPHON). The hygroscopicity for non-dust aerosol was much higher than that for dust conditions with the 𝑓𝛽(𝑅𝐻,𝜆532) being around 1.4 and 3.1, respectively, at the relative humidity of 86% for the two cases identified in this study. To study the effect of dust particles on the hygroscopicity of the overall atmospheric aerosol, the two types of aerosols were identified and separated by applying the polarization lidar photometer networking method in Case I. The hygroscopic enhancement factor of separated non-dust fine-mode particles in Case I had been significantly strengthened, getting closer to that of the total aerosol in Case II. These results were verified by the hygroscopicity parameter, κ (Case I non-dust particles: 0.357 ± 0.024; Case II total: 0.344 ± 0.026), based on the chemical components obtained by an aerosol chemical speciation instrument, both of which showed strong hygroscopicity. It was found that non-dust fine-mode aerosol contributes more during hygroscopic growth and that non-hygroscopic mineral dust aerosol may reduce the total hygroscopicity per unit volume in Beijing. | |
dc.description.uri | https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12050785 | |
dc.identifier | https://doi.org/10.13016/dspace/mquy-sxpn | |
dc.identifier.citation | Wu, T.; Li, Z.; Chen, J.; Wang, Y.; Wu, H.; Jin, X.; Liang, C.; Li, S.; Wang, W.; Cribb, M. Hygroscopicity of Different Types of Aerosol Particles: Case Studies Using Multi-Instrument Data in Megacity Beijing, China. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 785. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1903/31353 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | MDPI | |
dc.relation.isAvailableAt | College of Computer, Mathematical & Natural Sciences | en_us |
dc.relation.isAvailableAt | Atmospheric & Oceanic Science | en_us |
dc.relation.isAvailableAt | Digital Repository at the University of Maryland | en_us |
dc.relation.isAvailableAt | University of Maryland (College Park, MD) | en_us |
dc.subject | aerosol hygroscopicity | |
dc.subject | lidar observation | |
dc.subject | dust | |
dc.subject | non-dust | |
dc.subject | POLIPHON | |
dc.subject | chemical composition | |
dc.title | Hygroscopicity of Different Types of Aerosol Particles: Case Studies Using Multi-Instrument Data in Megacity Beijing, China | |
dc.type | Article | |
local.equitableAccessSubmission | No |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- remotesensing-12-00785-v2.pdf
- Size:
- 4.21 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format