Skip to content
University of Maryland LibrariesDigital Repository at the University of Maryland
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DRUM
    • College of Computer, Mathematical & Natural Sciences
    • Atmospheric & Oceanic Science
    • Atmospheric & Oceanic Science Research Works
    • View Item
    •   DRUM
    • College of Computer, Mathematical & Natural Sciences
    • Atmospheric & Oceanic Science
    • Atmospheric & Oceanic Science Research Works
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Validation of SO2 retrievals from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) over NE China

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    krotkov_etal_preprint-2.doc (3.185Mb)
    No. of downloads: 3632

    Date
    2008
    Author
    Krotkov, N. A.
    McClure, B.
    Dickerson, R. R.
    Carn, S.
    Li, C.
    Bhartia, P. K.
    Yang, K.
    Krueger, A.
    Li, Z.
    Levelt, P. F.
    Chen, Hongbin
    Wang, Pucai
    Lu, Daren
    Citation
    Validation of SO2 retrievals from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) over NE China, N. A. Krotkov, B. McClure, R. R. Dickerson, S. Carn, C. Li, P. K. Bhartia, K. Yang, A. Krueger, Z. Li, P. F. Levelt, Hongbin Chen, Pucai Wang and Daren Lu, J. Geophys. Res., 2008.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) launched on the NASA Aura satellite in July 2004 offers unprecedented spatial resolution, coupled with contiguous daily global coverage, for space-based UV measurements of sulfur dioxide (SO2). We present a first validation of the OMI SO2 data with in-situ aircraft measurements in NE China in April 2005. The study demonstrates that OMI can distinguish between background SO2 conditions and heavy pollution on a daily basis. The noise (expressed as the standard deviation, σ) in the PBL SO2 data is ~1.5DU (Dobson Unit, 2.691016 molecules/cm2) for instantaneous field of view (IFOV) data. By looking at the pristine South Pacific under optimal conditions we have determined that temporal and spatial averaging can improve the resolution of the instrument to σ ~ 0.3 DU; the long term average over this remote location was within 0.1 DU of zero. Under polluted conditions, however, Collection 2 data are higher than aircraft measurements by a factor of two in most cases. Parameterization of the airmass factor (AMF) appears to enhance the accuracy of the SO2 data. Improved calibrations of the radiance and irradiance data (Collection 3) result in better agreement with aircraft measurements on polluted days. The re-processed and AMF-corrected Collection 3 data still show positive bias and sensitivity to UV absorbing aerosols. The difference between the in situ data and the OMI daily PBL SO2 measurements within 30 km of the aircraft profiles was about 1 DU, equivalent to ~5 ppb from 0 to 3000 m altitude. Quantifying the SO2 profile and spectral dependence of aerosol absorption between 310 and 330 nm are critical for accurate estimates of SO2 from satellite UV measurements.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1903/8948
    Collections
    • Atmospheric & Oceanic Science Research Works
    Rights
    Accepted for publication in J. Geophys. Res. Copyright 2008 American Geophysical Union. Further reproduction or electronic distribution is not permitted.

    DRUM is brought to you by the University of Maryland Libraries
    University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-7011 (301)314-1328.
    Please send us your comments.
    Web Accessibility
     

     

    Browse

    All of DRUMCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister
    Pages
    About DRUMAbout Download Statistics

    DRUM is brought to you by the University of Maryland Libraries
    University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-7011 (301)314-1328.
    Please send us your comments.
    Web Accessibility