Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRosenfield, Sylvia Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorKandelman, Aimeeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2004-05-31T19:33:33Z
dc.date.available2004-05-31T19:33:33Z
dc.date.issued2003-12-08en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/41
dc.description.abstractTreatment integrity is an important, though underutilized, component of the research process. For a process to be effective, it must be implemented as intended. The IC-Teams model currently uses the Student Documentation Form (SDF) Review process to establish treatment integrity. However, the review process itself must be conducted with integrity. Thus, this study examined the impact of a structured training process and manual on the scoring of SDFs when compared to an expert rater. Five raters from a mid-Atlantic public school district were provided with training manuals based on pilot study recommendations, a training session, and opportunity to practice scoring. Participants then scored ten SDFs. The results of this study demonstrated an increase in scoring accuracy when compared to the pilot. However, certain items continued to be scored inaccurately despite careful attention paid to them in the training process. Implications and recommendations for change are discussed.en_US
dc.format.extent6795848 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.titleDevelopment and Field Test of a Training Manual to Increase the Accuracy of the IC-Team Model's Student Documentation Form Review Processen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentCounseling and Personnel Servicesen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledEducation, Educational Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledEducation, Social Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledPsychology, Generalen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record