Essays on Firm Compensation Policy and Confidentiality Protection and Imputation in the Quarterly Workforce Indicators
Essays on Firm Compensation Policy and Confidentiality Protection and Imputation in the Quarterly Workforce Indicators
Files
Publication or External Link
Date
2006-08-30
Authors
Stephens, Bryce
Advisor
Haltiwanger, John C
Citation
DRUM DOI
Abstract
This thesis is comprised of three chapters. The first chapter develops a statistical model that enriches the role that firms playin wage determination, allowing firms to influence both average wages as well as the returns to observable worker characteristics. I exploit the hierarchical nature of a unique employer-employee linked dataset maintained by the U.S. Census Bureau's Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics Program, estimating a multilevel statistical model of earnings that accounts for firm-specific deviations in average wages as well as the returns to components of human capital -- race, gender, education, and experience - while also controlling for person-level heterogeneity in earnings. Results suggest that there is significant variation in the returns to worker characteristics across firms. First, estimates of the parameters of the covariance matrix of firm-specific returns are statistically significant. Firms that tend to pay higher average wages also tend to pay higher than average returns to worker characteristics; firms that tend to reward highly the human capital of men also highly reward the human capital of women. Second, the firm-specific returns account for roughly 7\% of the variation in wages - approximately 30\% of the variation in wages explained by firm-specific intercepts alone.
The second chapter (joint with John M. Abowd and Lars Vilhuber) and third chapter discuss the confidentiality protections and imputation of place-of-work in the Quarterly Workforce Indicators produced by the Census Bureau's Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics Program as a part of its Local Employment Dynamics Estimates partnership with 37 state Labor Market Information offices. Both chapters provide a discussion of methodology as well as assessments of the impact of the confidentiality protections and imputation of place-of-work on the Quarterly Workforce Indicators public use measures.