Essays on Firm Compensation Policy and Confidentiality Protection and Imputation in the Quarterly Workforce Indicators
dc.contributor.advisor | Haltiwanger, John C | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Stephens, Bryce | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Economics | en_US |
dc.contributor.publisher | Digital Repository at the University of Maryland | en_US |
dc.contributor.publisher | University of Maryland (College Park, Md.) | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-02-01T20:20:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2007-02-01T20:20:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2006-08-30 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This thesis is comprised of three chapters. The first chapter develops a statistical model that enriches the role that firms playin wage determination, allowing firms to influence both average wages as well as the returns to observable worker characteristics. I exploit the hierarchical nature of a unique employer-employee linked dataset maintained by the U.S. Census Bureau's Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics Program, estimating a multilevel statistical model of earnings that accounts for firm-specific deviations in average wages as well as the returns to components of human capital -- race, gender, education, and experience - while also controlling for person-level heterogeneity in earnings. Results suggest that there is significant variation in the returns to worker characteristics across firms. First, estimates of the parameters of the covariance matrix of firm-specific returns are statistically significant. Firms that tend to pay higher average wages also tend to pay higher than average returns to worker characteristics; firms that tend to reward highly the human capital of men also highly reward the human capital of women. Second, the firm-specific returns account for roughly 7\% of the variation in wages - approximately 30\% of the variation in wages explained by firm-specific intercepts alone. The second chapter (joint with John M. Abowd and Lars Vilhuber) and third chapter discuss the confidentiality protections and imputation of place-of-work in the Quarterly Workforce Indicators produced by the Census Bureau's Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics Program as a part of its Local Employment Dynamics Estimates partnership with 37 state Labor Market Information offices. Both chapters provide a discussion of methodology as well as assessments of the impact of the confidentiality protections and imputation of place-of-work on the Quarterly Workforce Indicators public use measures. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 619582 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1903/4075 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.subject.pqcontrolled | Economics, General | en_US |
dc.subject.pqcontrolled | Economics, Labor | en_US |
dc.subject.pquncontrolled | Wage Dispersion | en_US |
dc.subject.pquncontrolled | Wage Structure | en_US |
dc.subject.pquncontrolled | Confidentiality | en_US |
dc.subject.pquncontrolled | Multiple Imputation | en_US |
dc.subject.pquncontrolled | Quarterly Workforce Indicators | en_US |
dc.title | Essays on Firm Compensation Policy and Confidentiality Protection and Imputation in the Quarterly Workforce Indicators | en_US |
dc.type | Dissertation | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1