Employee Mobility, Employee Entrepreneurship, and Employee Value Capture: Labor Market Frictions and the Impact of Social Comparison Costs on Compensation
Files
Publication or External Link
Date
Authors
Citation
DRUM DOI
Abstract
Strategic human capital research explores heterogeneity in firm performance
based on differences in firms’ abilities to leverage human capital. Much of the discussion
in this literature focuses on how firms can exploit isolating mechanisms that limit the
mobility of employees. This dissertation studies two important facets of strategic human
capital research related to the mobility of employees. The first essay explores how a
labor market frictions lens can connect the strategic human capital literature to the
employee entrepreneurship literature, two complementary but largely disparate
literatures. The examination of the impact of various labor market frictions on employee
mobility to competitor firms and employee transitions to entrepreneurship suggests that
the outcomes of some frictions are divergent across the two literatures, the outcomes of
some are aligned, and the outcomes of some are ambiguous. The complex interplay of
labor market frictions provides opportunities for future research specifically exploring the
intersection of the strategic human capital and employee entrepreneurship literatures.
The second essay of explores how multi-location firms facilitate the spread of
compensation increases across labor markets. Prior research cites the threat of employee
mobility as the primary mechanism for the spread of compensation increases across
locations. Multi-location firms that straddle more than one labor market, however, must
manage employees across labor markets. I propose that internal firm processes, including
social comparison between employees of the firm in different locations, may lead firms to
raise compensation for employees in other locations when addressing competitive
pressure in a given location. In doing so, these multi-location firms put pressure on local
labor market competitors to also raise compensation, leading to compensation increases
across distinct labor markets without reference to mobility constraints that dominate the
strategic human capital literature.