Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGoeringer, Paul
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-06T01:35:12Z
dc.date.available2016-10-06T01:35:12Z
dc.date.issued2016-09
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13016/M2SF7X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/18845
dc.descriptionHomeowners, landowners, pesticide applicators, and farmers are concerned about pesticide drift. It may injure a homeowner’s garden or flowers or ruin a neighboring farmer’s crop. While no Maryland court has considered the issue of liability from pesticide drift, courts in other states have. These decisions provide some guidance on how a Maryland court might handle the issue. Depending on the facts of the drift case, pesticide applicators and farmers could owe damages for nuisance or trespass case, or for uses inconsistent with the pesticide label.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFS;1050
dc.subjectpesticideen_US
dc.subjectnegligenceen_US
dc.subjectdrift liabilityen_US
dc.subjectpesticide driften_US
dc.subjectstrict liabilityen_US
dc.subjectagricultural lawen_US
dc.titleCurrent Legal Rules Benefit Spray Applicators When It Comes to Pesticide Driften_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtCollege of Agriculture & Natural Resources
dc.relation.isAvailableAtAgriculture Law Education Initiative
dc.relation.isAvailableAtDigital Repository at the University of Maryland
dc.relation.isAvailableAtUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md)


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record