Skip to content
University of Maryland LibrariesDigital Repository at the University of Maryland
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DRUM
    • Theses and Dissertations from UMD
    • UMD Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   DRUM
    • Theses and Dissertations from UMD
    • UMD Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    A STRUCTURAL MODEL OF INSECT CONTROL DECISIONS: ROOTWORM RESISTANCE IN US CORN FIELDS

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Wechsler_umd_0117E_15799.pdf (1.462Mb)
    No. of downloads: 238

    Date
    2014
    Author
    Wechsler, Seth James
    Advisor
    Lichtenberg, Erik
    DRUM DOI
    https://doi.org/10.13016/M21033
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Recent evidence from field tests and laboratory studies suggest that rootworms are adapting to the toxins produced by genetically modified, insect resistant (Bt) seeds. Given that rootworms cause over 1 billion dollars in yield losses and treatment costs per year, finding larger scale evidence of resistance could have important policy ramifications. This dissertation analyses corn farmers' insect control decisions in an effort to determine whether rootworms have adapted to Bt seeds. Chapter 1 provides a broad overview of the literature on genetically engineered (GE) seeds. It strives to correct many commonly held misperceptions about genetically modified seeds. Chapter 2 provides a detailed description of the economic literature on pesticide productivity and GE seed use. It compares structural to reduced form models, and discusses how previous studies have accounted for endogeniety. Chapter 3 develops a two stage, theoretical model of corn farmers' insect control decisions. This model is used to derive a non-linear, soil insecticide demand function. Chapter 4 presents the dissertation's empirical approach. First, it describes the data used in the analysis. Next, it discusses how to estimate the soil insecticide demand function derived in Chapter 3. Finally, it discusses how the parameters of the structural model can be used to determine how: a) Bt adoption affects yields, b) Bt adoption affects insecticide use, and c) whether the effectiveness of Bt seeds has changed over time. Chapter 5 provides the study's results. These results indicate that using rootworm resistant seeds would have decreased soil insecticide use by 70% in 2005 and 84% in 2010. Bt adoption would have increased yields by .6 percentage points (1.02 bushels/acre) in 2005 and .1 percentage points (.2 bushels per acre) in 2010. Alarmingly, the evidence suggests that rootworm resistant seeds were less effective in 2010 than in 2005, and less effective on farms where selective pressure was high than on farms where selective pressure was low. In other words, the results of this study support the hypothesis that rootworms are adapting to Bt seed use. Chapter 6 concludes.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1903/16207
    Collections
    • Agricultural & Resource Economics Theses and Dissertations
    • UMD Theses and Dissertations

    DRUM is brought to you by the University of Maryland Libraries
    University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-7011 (301)314-1328.
    Please send us your comments.
    Web Accessibility
     

     

    Browse

    All of DRUMCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister
    Pages
    About DRUMAbout Download Statistics

    DRUM is brought to you by the University of Maryland Libraries
    University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-7011 (301)314-1328.
    Please send us your comments.
    Web Accessibility