Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBaykoucheva, Svetla
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-06T15:56:40Z
dc.date.available2013-06-06T15:56:40Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citation4th International Conference on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics (WIS). July 28 - August 1, 2008, Berlin, Germany.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/13940
dc.descriptionPoster.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe current aggressive tactics of pharmaceutical companies to promote their drugs directly to consumers makes it important to researchers, physicians, and the general public to know what the affiliations and co‐authorships of those publishing on these drugs are. The most widely used database for retrieving biomedical literature is MEDLINE/PubMED, because it is a comprehensive and free resource. New refining and analytical tools available from the Web of Science (WoS), though, allow performing a much more in‐depth analysis of the literature in a particular field. WoS has recently become even more attractive to researchers with the addition of HistCite, a program that allows identifying the key literature and reconstructing the history and development of a particular research field. This study examines the institutional affiliations and co‐authorships of the most prolific authors who have published articles on the cholesterol‐lowering drug Atorvastatin (Lipitor). The literature on the latter was chosen because this drug has been on the market for a long time and it is currently the most prescribed drug in the world. Since WoS is usually not the preferred database for retrieving biomedical literature, the number of documents published on Atorvastatin that were retrieved from the WoS was compared to the number of documents retrieved through MEDLINE. The HistCite software allows performing in‐depth analysis of the scientific literature, but it can be used only with the WoS. In order to justify the use of WoS in this study (MEDLINE is considered the standard database for retrieving biomedical literature), the performance of WoS was compared to the performance of MEDLINE. Identical searches were performed in both WoS and MEDLINE and the results were limited to documents published on atorvastatin from 1994 to 2007. WoS retrieved more documents than MEDLINE (4,173 and 2910, respectively), for the period under study, and performed equally well or even better with respect to the number of documents retrieved for each year.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin Institute for Library and Information Science and COLLNET, Germany.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectBaykoushevaen_US
dc.subjectHistCiteen_US
dc.subjectDrug informationen_US
dc.subjectAtorvastatinen_US
dc.subjectLipitoren_US
dc.subjectinstitutional affiliationsen_US
dc.subjectEugene Garfielden_US
dc.subjectWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.subjectMEDLINEen_US
dc.subjectpharmaceutical companiesen_US
dc.subjectPubMeden_US
dc.subjectCOLLNETen_US
dc.subjectscientometricsen_US
dc.titleAnalyzing the literature on drugs with Web of Science and HistCite: Institutional affiliations of the most prolific authors publishing on Atorvastatin (Lipitor)en_US
dc.typePresentationen_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_us
dc.relation.isAvailableAtUniversity of Maryland Librariesen_us
dc.relation.isAvailableAtUniversity of Maryland (College Park, MD)en_us


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record