Lively Streets: Exploring the relationship between built environment and social behavior

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorBrower, Sidney Nen_US
dc.contributor.authorMehta, Vikasen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUrban and Regional Planning and Designen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-02-01T20:22:41Z
dc.date.available2007-02-01T20:22:41Z
dc.date.issued2006-11-27en_US
dc.description.abstractStreets constitute a significant part of open public space and are the most important symbols of the public realm. Streets that cater to the functional, social, and leisure needs of people have been positively associated with economic growth, physical health of people, and a sense of community. Increasingly, scholars suggest thinking of the street as a social space rather than just a channel for movement. Despite such suggestions, few studies have addressed the relationships between social behavior and the environmental quality of the street. Moreover, the studies that have, tend to separate the study of physical features from land uses, and hence do not deal with the interrelationships between behavioral patterns and the physical features of the street, and its sociability. This dissertation was an empirical examination of behavioral responses, perceptions, and attitudes of people to the physical characteristics, use, and management of the neighborhood commercial street in two cities and one town in the Boston metropolitan area. It used methods based in environment-behavior sciences involving extensive observations of these streets over eight months, and interviews with people using these streets to understand their behaviors and perceptions. The biggest competitive advantage of neighborhood commercial streets is their ability to support social interaction. The findings reveal that people were equally concerned with the social and physical dimensions of the street. The presence of community places and the street's landuse and physical character determined the use of the street. People preferred settings that had stores that were community-gathering places, which held special collective meanings for the people of the neighborhood and were thus destinations to meet friends and to see other people and activities; that had a variety of stores on the block, particularly those that served daily shopping needs; that had unique independently operated stores with friendly service, a distinctive character and ambience, and personalized shop-windows and entrances; that were pedestrian-friendly with ample sidewalk space with seating and other street furniture, and shade and shelter; and that had buildings with permeable and articulated street facades providing sheltered small-scale spaces.en_US
dc.format.extent6761407 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/4165
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledUrban and Regional Planningen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledurban designen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledenvironmenten_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledbehavior and perceptionen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledsocial interactionen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledstreets as social spaceen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledphysicalen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledsocial and landuse characteristics of street environment designen_US
dc.titleLively Streets: Exploring the relationship between built environment and social behavioren_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
umi-umd-3962.pdf
Size:
6.45 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

UMD Theses and Dissertations
Urban and Regional Planning and Design Theses and Dissertations