The Exiles' Return: Emigres, Anti-Nazis, and the Basic Law

dc.contributor.advisorHerf, Jeffreyen_US
dc.contributor.authorMiner, Samuel Jamesen_US
dc.contributor.departmentHistoryen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-13T05:30:47Z
dc.date.available2021-07-13T05:30:47Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation traces the historical origins of several novel features of the postwar West German Constitution (Basic Law). Next to a legally enforceable catalogue of basic rights, the novelty of the 1949 Basic Law lay in articles outlining the forfeiture of those basic rights for any individual, organization, or political party who fights against the “fundamental liberal-democratic order.” This is a pillar of “militant democracy,” a term invented by the emigre jurist Karl Loewenstein, but a feature of German constitutionalism since it uses by the Federal Constitutional Court. That court occupies the position of “guardian of the constitution” in postwar Germany. Postwar “new German constitutionalism” (Kommers) was largely a project of the parliamentary left. Despite their historical aversion to judicial power, postwar German anti-Nazis transferred tremendous powers to the judiciary, especially state and federal constitutional courts. The following dissertation is a collective intellectual biography of the key anti-Nazi and emigre constitutional framers behind the state and federal constitutions. It examines their lives between the Nazi seizure of power in 1933 and the late 1950s, when the Federal Constitutional Court established itself as the final arbiter of German law. The Federal Constitutional Court with its powers of judicial review was not an American export. Rather, it was a German response to the circumstances of postwar occupied Germany. Judicial review came to Germany as an anti-Nazi measure designed to prevent the continued use of Nazi statutes in defense of war criminals. Judges in Allied-occupied Germany were asked to review statutes for their adherence to principles of justice to avoid light sentences for Nazi criminals. To counter the tendencies of a reactionary judiciary, anti-Nazi jurists campaigned for a lay judiciary with mixed results. The state constitutions of the American occupation zone provided the prototype for how a “militant democracy” would function in postwar West Germany. The state constitutions were anti-Nazi documents written in response to the horrors of the Second World War and the Holocaust. The framers of the state constitutions came from the ranks of recent re-emigrants and concentration camp survivors. The following dissertation examines their contributions to postwar law and politics.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13016/2ew7-ffnt
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/27341
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledEuropean historyen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledHolocaust studiesen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledLawen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledBiographyen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledConstitutional Historyen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledIntellectual Historyen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledLegal Historyen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledNazi Germanyen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledPostwar Europeen_US
dc.titleThe Exiles' Return: Emigres, Anti-Nazis, and the Basic Lawen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Miner_umd_0117E_21472.pdf
Size:
2.95 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
(RESTRICTED ACCESS)