Lauding and Loathing in the Works of Shakespeare: Epideictic Skepticism and the Ethics of Praise

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorGrossman, Marshallen_US
dc.contributor.authorTartamella, Suzanne Marieen_US
dc.contributor.departmentEnglish Language and Literatureen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-07-03T05:32:25Z
dc.date.available2010-07-03T05:32:25Z
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.description.abstractMy dissertation argues that Shakespeare transforms Aristotelian <italic>epideixis</italic> (the rhetorical mode comprising praise and blame) into a skeptical mode by laying bare its embedded ethical and epistemological problems. Shakespeare, that is, uses the evaluative procedures inherent within epideictic poetry to scrutinize its own principles of representation, transforming a poetics of praise into a poetics of appraisal. His innovations in the Petrarchan sonnet form stand at the center of my project, but I also illuminate how Shakespeare's epideictic skepticism underlies his experimentation with tragedy and comedy. In a broader perspective, my project shows how an intimacy between philosophical skepticism and the practice of praise had its roots in the cultural and religious upheavals of the sixteenth century. The cornerstone of my project is Shakespeare's young-man sonnets, which provide a unique angle from which to understand the dark-lady poems and some key Shakespearean plays. I show that while the first sequence (1-126) investigates the epistemology of praise, the second (127-52) describes the dramatic interactions between lovers who have advanced beyond epideictic poetry and its accompanying skepticism. Chapter 1, primarily an introduction to my study, considers the religious and cultural background for Shakespeare's epideictic skepticism, reviews classical and Renaissance theories of praise, and closely reads poems by Shakespeare and Petrarch. Chapter 2 explores the canker as the central symbol of Shakespeare's epideictic skepticism and as a threat to the rose of beauty and praise. Tracing the poet's struggle with this persistent figure of satire and blame, I contend that the canker is inherent in the practice of praise. My third chapter maps my interpretation of the canker and the rose onto a new reading of <italic>Hamlet</italic>. I argue that the young-man sonnets provide a paradigm for understanding Hamlet's relationship with his two fathers, his misogyny and verbal abuse, and the tragic path to which he finally commits himself. Chapter 4 offers a comic resolution to the rhetorical problems emphasized in the previous three chapters. Here, finally, I turn to the sonnets devoted to the notoriously rebellious dark mistress, exploring their relationship to Shakespearean comedy generally and to <italic>The Taming of the Shrew</italic> particularly.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/10439
dc.subject.pqcontrolledLiterature, British & Irishen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledLiterature, Medievalen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledepideixisen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledpraiseen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledShakespeareen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledskepticismen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledsonnetsen_US
dc.titleLauding and Loathing in the Works of Shakespeare: Epideictic Skepticism and the Ethics of Praiseen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Tartamella_umd_0117E_11290.pdf
Size:
1.19 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

UMD Theses and Dissertations
English Theses and Dissertations