Translation memory retrieval methods
dc.contributor.author | Bloodgood, Michael | |
dc.contributor.author | Strauss, Benjamin | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-07-15T23:29:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-07-15T23:29:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-04 | |
dc.description.abstract | Translation Memory (TM) systems are one of the most widely used translation technologies. An important part of TM systems is the matching algorithm that determines what translations get retrieved from the bank of available translations to assist the human translator. Although detailed accounts of the matching algorithms used in commercial systems can’t be found in the literature, it is widely believed that edit distance algorithms are used. This paper investigates and evaluates the use of several matching algorithms, including the edit distance algorithm that is believed to be at the heart of most modern commercial TM systems. This paper presents results showing how well various matching algorithms correlate with human judgments of helpfulness (collected via crowdsourcing with Amazon’s Mechanical Turk). A new algorithm based on weighted n-gram precision that can be adjusted for translator length preferences consistently returns translations judged to be most helpful by translators for multiple domains and language pairs. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Michael Bloodgood and Benjamin Strauss. 2014. Translation memory retrieval methods. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 202-210, Gothenburg, Sweden, April. Association for Computational Linguistics. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1903/15528 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Association for Computational Linguistics | en_US |
dc.relation.isAvailableAt | Center for Advanced Study of Language | |
dc.relation.isAvailableAt | Digitial Repository at the University of Maryland | |
dc.relation.isAvailableAt | University of Maryland (College Park, Md) | |
dc.subject | computer science | en_US |
dc.subject | statistical methods | en_US |
dc.subject | computational linguistics | en_US |
dc.subject | information retrieval | en_US |
dc.subject | natural language processing | en_US |
dc.subject | human language technology | en_US |
dc.subject | translation technology | en_US |
dc.subject | computer-aided translation | en_US |
dc.subject | computer-assisted translation | en_US |
dc.subject | CAT tools | en_US |
dc.subject | translation memory systems | en_US |
dc.subject | translation memory retrieval methods | en_US |
dc.subject | Amazon Mechanical Turk | en_US |
dc.subject | matching algorithms | en_US |
dc.subject | fuzzy match | en_US |
dc.subject | fuzzy match algorithms | en_US |
dc.subject | fuzzy match score | en_US |
dc.subject | percent match | en_US |
dc.subject | weighted percent match | en_US |
dc.subject | edit distance | en_US |
dc.subject | n-gram precision | en_US |
dc.subject | weighted n-gram precision | en_US |
dc.subject | modified weighted n-gram precision | en_US |
dc.subject | translation match score threshold | en_US |
dc.subject | fuzzy match threshold | en_US |
dc.subject | fuzzy match score threshold | en_US |
dc.subject | match length preferences | en_US |
dc.subject | translation match length preferences | en_US |
dc.title | Translation memory retrieval methods | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- translationMemoryEACL2014.pdf
- Size:
- 192.92 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format