DISSOLVED AND GASEOUS FLUXES OF CARBON AND NITROGEN FROM URBAN WATERSHEDS OF THE CHESAPEAKE BAY

dc.contributor.advisorKaushal, Sujay Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Rose Marieen_US
dc.contributor.departmentGeologyen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-22T05:52:11Z
dc.date.available2016-06-22T05:52:11Z
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.description.abstractCarbon and nitrogen loading to streams and rivers contributes to eutrophication as well as greenhouse gas (GHG) production in streams, rivers and estuaries. My dissertation consists of three research chapters, which examine interactions and potential trade-offs between water quality and greenhouse gas production in urban streams of the Chesapeake Bay watershed. My first research project focused on drivers of carbon export and quality in an urbanized river. I found that watershed carbon sources (soils and leaves) contributed more than in-stream production to overall carbon export, but that periods of high in-stream productivity were important over seasonal and daily timescales. My second research chapter examined the influence of urban storm-water and sanitary infrastructure on dissolved and gaseous carbon and nitrogen concentrations in headwater streams. Gases (CO2, CH4, and N2O) were consistently super-saturated throughout the course of a year. N2O concentrations in streams draining septic systems were within the high range of previously published values. Total dissolved nitrogen concentration was positively correlated with CO2 and N2O and negatively correlated with CH4. My third research chapter examined a long-term (15-year) record of GHG emissions from soils in rural forests, urban forest, and urban lawns in Baltimore, MD. CO2, CH4, and N2O emissions showed positive correlations with temperature at each site. Lawns were a net source of CH4 + N2O, whereas forests were net sinks. Gross CO2 fluxes were also highest in lawns, in part due to elevated growing-season temperatures. While land cover influences GHG emissions from soils, the overall role of land cover on this flux is very small (< 0.5%) compared with gases released from anthropogenic sources, according to a recent GHG budget of the Baltimore metropolitan area, where this study took place.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13016/M2RN35
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/18247
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledBiogeochemistryen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledEnvironmental scienceen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledWater resources managementen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledCarbonen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledGreenhouse Gasesen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledMethaneen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledNitrogenen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledNitrous Oxideen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledUrban Streamsen_US
dc.titleDISSOLVED AND GASEOUS FLUXES OF CARBON AND NITROGEN FROM URBAN WATERSHEDS OF THE CHESAPEAKE BAYen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Smith_umd_0117E_16983.pdf
Size:
6.05 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format