A STUDY OF GENDER DIVERSITY IN U.S. ARCHITECTURE, ENGINEERING, AND CONSTRUCTION (AEC) INDUSTRY LEADERSHIP

dc.contributor.advisorCui, Qingbinen_US
dc.contributor.authorHickey, Paul Josephen_US
dc.contributor.departmentCivil Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-23T05:51:12Z
dc.date.available2023-06-23T05:51:12Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.description.abstractAnecdotally, men dominate the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) field. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by quantifying the gender composition of the c-suite, identifying differences in career paths between women and men, and gathering in-depth information on women engineering executives’ professional stories. Using the industry recognized Engineering News Record (ENR) Top 400 largest companies, initial phase of this research found women filled 3.9% of engineering executive positions in 2019, reducing to 3.5% in 2021. However, certain sub-segments, highlighted by firms with a public commitment to diversity, ENR Top 100 Green companies, and larger organizations, offer more opportunities to women. Exploring further into individual and collective career paths, researchers applied web scraping algorithms to extract LinkedIn data for 2,857 industry leaders. Data found that women work for more companies (+56%), hold more positions (+19%), earn more advanced degrees (53.9% to 31.2%), assemble larger professional networks (+14%), yet remain significantly underrepresented (-83%). Confirming a difference between the career paths of women and men, Machine Learning (ML) modeling predicted profile genders with 98.95% training sample and 89.53% testing sample accuracy. Final stage of research incorporates interviews with women engineering executives, seeking to learn about pathways and barriers in their respective and collective professional journeys and test the findings from the initial two phases of this study. An overriding theme throughout the progressive study, recommendations for increasing women’s representation include directed Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) scholarships for young girls, targeted recruiting of women, establishing mentoring relationships, and creating nurturing cultures to retain early and mid-career women.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13016/dspace/pjzi-3n92
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/29963
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledCivil engineeringen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledWomen's studiesen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledCareer pathen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledConstruction industryen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledDiversityen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledGenderen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledLeadershipen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledSocial media networkingen_US
dc.titleA STUDY OF GENDER DIVERSITY IN U.S. ARCHITECTURE, ENGINEERING, AND CONSTRUCTION (AEC) INDUSTRY LEADERSHIPen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Hickey_umd_0117E_23180.pdf
Size:
2.04 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format