INDIGENOUS INVOLVEMENT IN ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION: AN ANALYSIS OF VIRGINIA’S SOVEREIGN NATIONS INVOLVEMENT IN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM
dc.contributor.advisor | Shaffer, L. J. | en_US |
dc.contributor.advisor | Rose, Kenneth A. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Brooks, Nicole L | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Environmental Science and Technology | en_US |
dc.contributor.publisher | Digital Repository at the University of Maryland | en_US |
dc.contributor.publisher | University of Maryland (College Park, Md.) | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-14T06:52:36Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-02-14T06:52:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Indigenous involvement in conservation and restoration practices, specifically those funded by government entities (e.g., EPA, USGS, NOAA), is not well documented in the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States. Increased Indigenous involvement in conservation and restoration projects globally, raises questions regarding this apparent environmental practice gap in the Eastern United States (McAlvay, 2021; Poto, 2021; Turner, 2010). Currently, government-led restoration projects in the Chesapeake Bay, led by the Chesapeake Bay Program, lack a strong Indigenous presence or contribution despite 7 federally-recognized Sovereign Nations in the surrounding watershed. To understand this gap, a literature review was first conducted to provide an initial context for viewing the contemporary Indigenous involvement in Chesapeake Bay restoration. The review was the basis for a detailed analysis of Virginia’s Sovereign Nation involvement in the Chesapeake Bay Program that used a series of interviews, participant observations, and a social network analysis. Interview participants were classified into one of three representative categories: Sovereign Nation, government organization, and non-government organization. Questions about working relationships between organizations were assessed to understand the political-ecological dynamics driving the interactions in the Chesapeake Bay restoration social network, specifically among the representative categories. Results showed a lack of a consistent and intentional relationship between the Sovereign Nations of Virginia and the Chesapeake Bay Program. According to the federal trust relationship, this infers that the lack of a strong Sovereign Nation involvement in the Chesapeake Bay Program may be contributing to a continued state of Environmental Injustice. To begin to address this low-level of involvement, the Chesapeake Bay Program should devote significant effort to building intentional relationships with the Sovereign Nations, including a more formal and official representation within the Chesapeake Bay Program. | en_US |
dc.identifier | https://doi.org/10.13016/6kgz-raka | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1903/31776 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.subject.pqcontrolled | Environmental science | en_US |
dc.subject.pqcontrolled | Environmental management | en_US |
dc.subject.pqcontrolled | Social research | en_US |
dc.subject.pquncontrolled | Ecological Restoration | en_US |
dc.subject.pquncontrolled | Indigenous Environmental Justice | en_US |
dc.subject.pquncontrolled | Indigenous Political Ecology | en_US |
dc.title | INDIGENOUS INVOLVEMENT IN ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION: AN ANALYSIS OF VIRGINIA’S SOVEREIGN NATIONS INVOLVEMENT IN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |