On Experiencers and Minimality

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorHornestein, Norberten_US
dc.contributor.advisorLasnik, Howarden_US
dc.contributor.authorDe Oliveira Almeida Petersen, Maria Carolinaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentLinguisticsen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-03T05:43:05Z
dc.date.available2016-09-03T05:43:05Z
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation is concerned with experiencer arguments, and what they tell us about the grammar. There are two main types of experiencers I discuss: experiencers of psychological verbs and experiencers of raising constructions. I question the notion of ‘experiencers’ itself; and explore some possible accounts for the ‘psych-effects’. I argue that the ‘experiencer theta role’ is conceptually unnecessary and unsustained by syntactic evidence. ‘Experiencers’ can be reduced to different types of arguments. Taking Brazilian Portuguese as my main case study, I claim that languages may grammaticalize psychological predicates and their arguments in different ways. These verb classes exist in languages independently, and the psych-verbs behavior can be explained by the argument structure of the verbal class they belong to. I further discuss experiencers in raising structures, and the defective intervention effects triggered by different types of experiencers (e.g., DPs, PPs, clitics, traces) in a variety of languages. I show that defective intervention is mostly predictable across languages, and there’s not much variation regarding its effects. Moreover, I argue that defective intervention can be captured by a notion of minimality that requires interveners to be syntactic objects and not syntactic occurrences (a chain, and not a copy/trace). The main observation is that once a chain is no longer in the c-command domain of a probe, defective intervention is obviated, i.e., it doesn’t apply. I propose a revised version of the Minimal Link Condition (1995), in which only syntactic objects may intervene in syntactic relations, and not copies. This view of minimality can explain the core cases of defective intervention crosslinguistically.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13016/M22B7C
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/18605
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledLinguisticsen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolleddefective interventionen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledExperiencersen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledMinimalityen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledPsych-verbsen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledRomance languagesen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledSyntaxen_US
dc.titleOn Experiencers and Minimalityen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
DeOliveiraAlmeidaPetersen_umd_0117E_17471.pdf
Size:
1.98 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

UMD Theses and Dissertations
Linguistics Theses and Dissertations