Combining community participatory research with a randomized clinical trial: The protecting the hood against tobacco (PHAT) smoking cessation study

dc.contributor.authorFroelicher, Erika Sivarajan
dc.contributor.authorDoolan, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorYerger, Valerie B.
dc.contributor.authorMcGruder, Carol O.
dc.contributor.authorMalone, Ruth E.
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-14T15:03:13Z
dc.date.available2019-08-14T15:03:13Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: This article describes the process and results of a smoking cessation intervention randomized clinical trial (RCT) that was conducted as a community-based participatory research project. This RCT tested whether outcomes are improved by adding social justice and tobacco industry targeting messages to a smoking cessation program conducted among African American adults within a low-income community in San Francisco, California. This study provides lessons for future similar research projects that focus on urban low-income populations. METHODS: Participants were randomly allocated to receive a smoking-cessation program (control group [CG]) or CG care plus tobacco industry and media (IAM) messages. Primary interventions were behavioral. At intake, participants reporting severe withdrawal or smoking > or = 25 cigarettes daily were offered free nicotine replacement therapy. Baseline data were from an in-person interview. Outcome measures included self-reported smoking status; validation of quitting was by salivary cotinine assays. RESULTS: Of 87 participants providing baseline data, 31% (27) did not join the RCT. Proportions quitting in the CG and IAM group were 11.5% and 13.6% at 6 months and 5.3% and 15.8% at 12 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: African Americans in underserved inner-city neighborhoods can be recruited into RCTs with community participatory approaches. Differences between the CG and IAM in proportions who quit were 2.1% and 10.5% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. More than 3 years with adequate funding, high staffing ratios, and intense outreach and follow-up schedules are needed to achieve recruitment and study goals.
dc.description.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2009.06.004
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13016/6arp-zral
dc.identifier.citationFroelicher, Erika Sivarajan and Doolan, Daniel and Yerger, Valerie B. and McGruder, Carol O. and Malone, Ruth E. (2010) Combining community participatory research with a randomized clinical trial: The protecting the hood against tobacco (PHAT) smoking cessation study. Heart & Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical Care, 39 (1). pp. 50-63.
dc.identifier.issn01479563
dc.identifier.otherEprint ID 2760
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/23413
dc.subjectSmoking & Tobacco Use
dc.subjectoutreach
dc.subjectinterventions
dc.subjectstudies
dc.subjectmethodologies
dc.subjectAfrican Americans
dc.subjectsmoking cessation
dc.subjectrandomized clinical trial (RCT)
dc.subjectcommunity-based participatory research
dc.titleCombining community participatory research with a randomized clinical trial: The protecting the hood against tobacco (PHAT) smoking cessation study
dc.typeArticle

Files