Modeling Wise Angers Online: Generation Z Activists and Their Digital Rhetorics of Feminist Rage

dc.contributor.advisorEnoch, Jessicaen_US
dc.contributor.authorStarr, Brittany Noelle Schoedelen_US
dc.contributor.departmentEnglish Language and Literatureen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-06T05:38:03Z
dc.date.available2023-10-06T05:38:03Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.description.abstract“Modeling Wise Angers Online: Generation Z Activists and Their Digital Rhetorics of Feminist Rage” works at the nexus of feminist theory, digital media studies, and rhetoric to investigate how teen and young adult activists use 21st century social media technologies to challenge the sexist, racist, ageist, and ableist anger norms that disenfranchise young women in the public sphere. Each chapter theorizes what I call a “wise anger” strategy that its principal subject deploys to generate rhetorical agency for angry girl activists and change oppressive anger norms. The activists I examine are Greta Thunberg, Thandiwe Abdullah, and Shina Novalinga. While their causes range from the climate crisis to racial justice and Indigenous rights, and their primary platforms in my case studies are Twitter, Instagram, and TikTok, respectively, they all make innovative, strategic use of digital affordances to reframe young women’s anger in public discourse. Examining datasets I compiled from the activists’ social media posts between 2018-2022, I use grounded theory and rhetorical analysis to identify patterns in the anger expressions in the multimodal, multilayered posts. I read the patterns through feminist and Black feminist theories of oppressive anger norms (Jaggar, Ahmed, Traister, Chemaly, Lorde, Cooper, Judd, Collins), cultural rhetorical frameworks (Powell et al.; Karetak, Tester, and Tagalik) and youth activist rhetorical frameworks (Applegarth, Hesford, Taft, Dingo). This dissertation is premised on the understanding that emotions have a biological basis, but are constructed socially, rhetorically, and culturally and thus tend to be scripted in ways that reproduce asymmetrical relations of power (Aristotle, Dixon, Fine, Gross, Harrington, Koerber). Ultimately, I develop a theory of wise anger as an angry response to injustice that is intelligent, informed, constructive, justice-oriented, hope-driven, rational, reasonable, and moral. The wise anger these youth activists model through their digital rhetorics on social media is part of a genealogy of feminist rage that envisions and enacts a more inclusive, more livable world.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13016/dspace/31lp-9muq
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/30745
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledRhetoric and Compositionen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledMultimedia communicationsen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledGender studiesen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledanger normsen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledgeneration zen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledintersectionalityen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledsocial changeen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledsocial mediaen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledyouth activismen_US
dc.titleModeling Wise Angers Online: Generation Z Activists and Their Digital Rhetorics of Feminist Rageen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Starr_umd_0117E_23371.pdf
Size:
3.54 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format