PLATONIC CO-PARENTING: A NEW LENS INTO THE UNFINISHED GENDER REVOLUTION

dc.contributor.advisorChuang, Juliaen_US
dc.contributor.advisorMadhavan, Sangeethaen_US
dc.contributor.authorReddy, Shilpaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentSociologyen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-23T06:07:03Z
dc.date.available2024-09-23T06:07:03Z
dc.date.issued2024en_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this dissertation is to investigate the extent to which platonic co-parenting (PCP), an alternative family form in which parenting is separated from romantic relationships and often also from coresidence, is creating and sustaining gender egalitarian parenting relationships. In other words, how gender egalitarian are these parenting partnerships? Using 32 in-depth semi-structured interviews with men, women, non-binary and trans people, who were at different stages of the PCP journey, I investigated the practice of platonic co-parenting by focusing on the motivations for people to choose the PCP path to parenting; and how they navigated gendered patriarchal norms in the process of becoming PCPs including division of household labor. I found two broad categories of people who were drawn to PCP: those who attempted to subvert hegemonic, heteronormative ideals of family and parenting; and those who attempted to reproduce these ideals. The subverters aspired to form gender egalitarian and equal partnerships whereas the reproducers desired/imagined the mother as the primary parent and the father’s role being closer to a sperm donor’s—a father figure as opposed to an involved father. Among the subverters, the realities of the division of labor once they had a child turned out to be far less gender egalitarian than they had intended as the pull of traditional gender norms was quite strong for both men and women. PCPs engaged in gendered boundary work to separate aspects of their family that fell in the transactional realm and those that fell in the intimate/sacred realm free of monetary or other exchanges. Framing certain activities (childbearing, breastfeeding, relocation, and parental leave) as intimate had the unintended consequence of creating inequality between the male and female co-parents. By using the language of altruism to naturalize their arrangements, PCPs intend to be seen as “real” families while leaving in place traditional cleavages of the gendered division of labor.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13016/zjx8-t566
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/33390
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledSociologyen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledco-parentingen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledegalitarianen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledfeministen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledgenderen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledintimacyen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledplatonicen_US
dc.titlePLATONIC CO-PARENTING: A NEW LENS INTO THE UNFINISHED GENDER REVOLUTIONen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Reddy_umd_0117E_24576.pdf
Size:
1.01 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
(RESTRICTED ACCESS)