Structural Racism in the United States: A Report to the U.N. Committee for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination on the occasion of its review of the Periodic Report of the United States of America

dc.contributor.authorMenendian, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorSpencer, Marguerite
dc.contributor.authorKnuth, Lidija
dc.contributor.authorPowell, John
dc.contributor.authorJackson, Sara
dc.contributor.authorFajana, Fran
dc.contributor.authorGrant-Thomas, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorReece, Jason
dc.contributor.authorPaterson, Eva
dc.contributor.authorRapp, Kimberly
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-14T15:01:12Z
dc.date.available2019-08-14T15:01:12Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.description.abstractAs a signatory to the Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD), 1 the United States is under an obligation to condemn and pursue a policy of eliminating racial discrimination, in all its forms (art. 2, ¶1). The U.S. has not taken seriously the duty under Article 2 of CERD to affirmatively address racial discrimination. Instead, the U.S. has rationalized racial discriminatory effects as not covered by U.S. law. Sometimes these effects are caused by explicit government polices. At other times they are caused by private actors. Frequently, it is a combination of both. The Convention defines racial discrimination (art. 1, ¶1) to mean distinctions, exclusions, restrictions or preferences based on race which have “the purpose or effect” of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in any field of public life. CERD’s definition of discrimination is unequivocal: effects and racially disparate outcomes caused by individual action or government practices or policies, singularly or collectively, are of primary concern. Contrary to CERD, U.S. law defines racial discrimination more narrowly in at least two critical respects. First, with few exceptions U.S. law narrowly defines cognizable racial discrimination by requiring evidence of intent to discriminate. Section II demonstrates that such a requirement is contrary to the framework of CERD and does not reflect the real-world operation of discriminatory behavior in contemporary American society.
dc.description.urihttp://www.docstoc.com/docs/22294168/Structural-Racism-in-the-United-States
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13016/6irr-zuai
dc.identifier.citationMenendian, Stephen and Spencer, Marguerite and Knuth, Lidija and Powell, John and Jackson, Sara and Fajana, Fran and Grant-Thomas, Andrew and Reece, Jason and Paterson, Eva and Rapp, Kimberly (2008) Structural Racism in the United States: A Report to the U.N. Committee for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination on the occasion of its review of the Periodic Report of the United States of America. Working Paper. UNSPECIFIED.
dc.identifier.otherEprint ID 984
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/22941
dc.subjectHealth Equity
dc.subjectPractice
dc.subjectRacial Discrimination
dc.subjectobligation to condemn
dc.subjecteliminating racial discrimination
dc.subjectrationalized racial discriminatory effects
dc.subjectgovernment polices
dc.subjectcontemporary American society
dc.subjectU.S. law
dc.subjectintent to discriminate
dc.titleStructural Racism in the United States: A Report to the U.N. Committee for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination on the occasion of its review of the Periodic Report of the United States of America
dc.typeTechnical Report

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Structural_Racism.pdf
Size:
275.67 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format