American Bards: James M. Whitfield, Eliza R. Snow, John Rollin Ridge, and Walt Whitman

dc.contributor.advisorLevine, Robert S.en_US
dc.contributor.advisorSmith, Martha N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWhitley, Edwarden_US
dc.contributor.departmentEnglish Language and Literatureen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2004-08-27T05:23:03Z
dc.date.available2004-08-27T05:23:03Z
dc.date.issued2004-07-26en_US
dc.description.abstractDespite recent efforts to recover a diverse range of nineteenth-century American poets, the aura that continues to surround Walt Whitman as the quintessential American bard has yet to be sufficiently challenged. This dissertation defamiliarizes the Whitman mystique of the national outsider-<i>cum</i>-national bard-the author as "one of the roughs" who also claims to be a representative American poet-by reinterpreting <i>Leaves of Grass</i> through the careers of three poets on the margins of national culture whose projects for American poetry parallel the central aspects of Whitman's own. During the 1850s, African American separatist James M. Whitfield, Mormon pioneer Eliza R. Snow, and Anglo-Cherokee journalist John Rollin Ridge claimed to speak for the United States as American bards despite the fact that they were only tenuously connected to the nation which they claimed to represent. Two years before Whitman first attempted to poetically contain a contradictory nation in the first (1855) edition of <i>Leaves of Grass</i>, James M. Whitfield recorded the conflicts of a nation riven by the contradictions of slavery in <i>America and Other Poems</i> (1853). Similarly, at the same time that Whitman was announcing himself as the poet of a new American religion, Eliza R. Snow had already been recognized as the poet laureate of a faith that observers such as Leo Tolstoy referred to as "the American religion." While Whitman would be characterized as "the first white aboriginal" by D. H. Lawrence in the early twentieth century, in the 1850s John Rollin Ridge had already constructed a poetic persona that attempted to mediate the United States' nostalgia for an indigenous past with its faith in national progress. By claiming to speak as national representatives to a nation that rejected them, Whitfield, Snow, and Ridge not only provide alternatives to a Whitman-centered approach to antebellum American poetry, they also offer insight into the contested nature of national identity at a time when poets in the United States were anxious to define their nation both politically and artistically.en_US
dc.format.extent1073456 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/1739
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledLiterature, Americanen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledWalt Whitmanen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledAntebellum Poetryen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledLiterary Nationalismen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledAfrican American Poetryen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledNative American Poetryen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledMormon Poetryen_US
dc.titleAmerican Bards: James M. Whitfield, Eliza R. Snow, John Rollin Ridge, and Walt Whitmanen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
umi-umd-1713.pdf
Size:
1.02 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format