The importance of being a complement: CED effects revisited

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorHornstein, Norbert Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorJurka, Johannesen_US
dc.contributor.departmentLinguisticsen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-07T05:47:18Z
dc.date.available2010-10-07T05:47:18Z
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation revisits subject island effects (Ross 1967, Chomsky 1973) cross-linguistically. Controlled acceptability judgment studies in German, English, Japanese and Serbian suggest that extraction out of specifiers is consistently degraded compared to extraction out of complements, indicating that the Condition on Extraction domains (CED, Huang 1982) is still empirically viable, contrary to recent claims (Stepanov 2007). As a consequence, recent treatments of the CED in terms of Multiple Spell-Out (Uriagereka 1999) are still tenable. First, a series of NP-subextraction experiments in German using <italic>was für</italic>-split is discussed. The results indicate that subject island effects cannot be reduced to freezing effects (Wexler \& Culicover 1981). Extraction out of in-situ subjects is degraded compared to extraction out of in-situ objects. Freezing incurs an additional cost, i.e., extraction out of moved domains is degraded compared to in-situ domains. Further results from German indicate that extraction out of in-situ unaccusative and passive subjects is <italic>en par</italic> with extraction out of objects, while extraction out of in-situ transitive and intransitive unergative subjects causes a decrease in acceptability. Additionally, extraction out of indirect objects is degraded compared to extraction out of direct objects. It is also observed that a second gap improves the acceptability of otherwise illicit <italic>was für</italic>-split, a phenomenon dubbed Across-the-Board (ATB)-<italic>was für</italic>-splitand analysed in terms of Sideward Movement (Hornstein \& Nunes 2002). Furthermore, wh-extraction out of non-finite sentential arguments also shows a significant subject/object asymmetry. Experiments in English indicate that NP-subextraction yields the familiar subject/object asymmetry, while the contrast largely disappears when PPs are fronted. Further results show that ECM and passive predicates do not improve the acceptability of the extraction out of subjects. Finally, subject subextraction patterns in Japanese and Serbian are investigated. Both Long-distance scrambling and clefting out of sentential subjects in Japanese leads to a stronger degradation than out of sentential objects. PP-extraction in Serbian also shows the same subject/object asymmetry, while no such contrast is found for Left Branch Extraction.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/10835
dc.subject.pqcontrolledLanguage, Linguisticsen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledLanguage, Modernen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledacceptability judgmentsen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledCEDen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledexperimental syntaxen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledislandsen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledsub-extractionen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledsubjectsen_US
dc.titleThe importance of being a complement: CED effects revisiteden_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Jurka_umd_0117E_11486.pdf
Size:
4.66 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

UMD Theses and Dissertations
Linguistics Theses and Dissertations