INHIBITION OF TYPE ONE INTERFERON SIGNALING THROUGH CROSSTALK WITH TOLL-LIKE RECEPTOR SIGNALING

dc.contributor.advisorBriken, Volker Ven_US
dc.contributor.authorShuster, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.departmentCell Biology & Molecular Geneticsen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-25T06:51:17Z
dc.date.available2025-01-25T06:51:17Z
dc.date.issued2024en_US
dc.description.abstractInterferons (IFNs) are a class of cytokines that play a prominent role in host immunity. Type I IFN is broadly associated with antiviral immunity and susceptibility to bacterial pathogens, but others have shown that type I IFN can be beneficial in some bacterial infections. Additionally, some bacterial infections such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Legionella pneumophila can inhibit type I IFN signaling. Questions remain such as how these bacteria inhibit type I IFN signaling as well as if other bacterial pathogens, such as Salmonella enterica, can also inhibit type I IFN signaling. Additionally, type III IFN is a relatively new class of IFN, providing antiviral protection similar to and at times redundant to type I IFN. There are some important non-redundant differences from type I IFN though, such as type III IFN’s broader activity at epithelial surfaces (like those in the lungs) and its reduced proinflammatory effects. The role of type III IFN in bacterial infections as well if bacteria can inhibit this signaling pathway remains poorly understood.Here, we examined if Salmonella enterica can inhibit type I IFN signaling, the specificities of the previously observed inhibition with Mtb infection, and how these bacterial infections are inhibiting this signaling. We demonstrate that Salmonella Typhimurium infection inhibits type I IFN signaling through crosstalk with TLR4 signaling. We establish that TLR4 signaling results in reduced surface level type I IFN receptor, which dampens cellular responsiveness to type I IFN. We show that Mtb does not inhibit type III IFN signaling and that it inhibits type I IFN signaling independently of virulence, specifically EsxA and ESX-5. Additionally, this inhibition of type I IFN signaling seems specific to mouse cells as Mtb-infected human macrophages and dendritic cells did not have inhibited type I IFN signaling. We observed that other TLR signaling pathways result in specifically inhibited type I IFN signaling. Synthesizing a model from our results, there appears to be a mouse-specific crosstalk pathway between TLR signaling and type I IFN signaling, resulting in dampened responsiveness to type I IFN through downregulation of cell surface type I IFN receptor.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13016/vrtj-fkyw
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/33638
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledCellular biologyen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledImmunologyen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledIFNen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledInterferonen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledSalmonellaen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledTLRen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledToll-like receptoren_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledTuberculosisen_US
dc.titleINHIBITION OF TYPE ONE INTERFERON SIGNALING THROUGH CROSSTALK WITH TOLL-LIKE RECEPTOR SIGNALINGen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Shuster_umd_0117E_24746.pdf
Size:
31.44 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format