Credit and Liquidity in the Macroeconomy
Files
Publication or External Link
Date
Authors
Advisor
Citation
DRUM DOI
Abstract
This dissertation studies the role of credit and liquidity in
macroeconomic fluctuations.
Chapter 1 analyzes the effect of endogenous unemployment risk on
the dynamics of recovery from a liquidity trap. In a liquidity trap,
an adverse demand shock raises unemployment and produces a period of slow hiring.
Slow hiring further reduces demand, both for standard precautionary reasons
and because credit conditions endogenously worsen, reducing households'
ability to borrow and consume. Multiple equilibrium paths exist, and which
one the economy follows depends on household expectations and the policy
rule adopted by the central bank after the economy exits the trap.
Employment remains depressed for a substantial period after an adverse shock
because high unemployment increases the dispersion of household debt holdings,
slowing the recovery of demand. I find that the initial household debt distribution
significantly affects the economy's sensitivity to a demand shock, and study
the role of central bank policy in mitigating the initial fall in employment
and promoting faster recovery.
Chapter 2 explores a novel channel through which financial shocks affect the
real economy through the supply of liquidity. I consider a model in
which firms require uncertain ongoing financing, and agency costs limit
their ability to raise new funds. To secure future financing, firms hold assets to sell
if needed, and purchase credit lines from financial intermediaries.
I collectively refer to these instruments as liquidity. Financial
intermediaries' ability to commit future funds depends on their capital.
This creates a linkage between bank balance sheets and the aggregate
supply of liquidity. Bank losses raise the liquidity premium and reduce
investment. I analyze the optimal supply of public liquidity, and find
that when private liquidity is scarce the government should issue bonds
for their liquidity properties. I further find that the optimal supply of
government debt is decreasing in bank capital. This suggests that in the wake
of a financial crisis in which financial intermediaries suffer large losses,
governments should increase debt issuance.
Chapter 3 considers the distributive implications of financial regulation.
It develops a model in which the financial sector
benefits from financial risk-taking by earning greater expected returns.
However, risk-taking also increases the incidence of large losses that lead
to credit crunches and impose negative externalities on the real economy. A
regulator has to trade off efficiency in the financial sector, which is
aided by deregulation, against efficiency in the real economy, which is
aided by tighter regulation and a more stable supply of credit.