Investigating the Relationship Between Micro and Macro Levels of Efficacy and Their Effects on Crime

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorPaternoster, Raymonden_US
dc.contributor.authorAhlin, Eileen M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentCriminology and Criminal Justiceen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-07-02T05:52:08Z
dc.date.available2010-07-02T05:52:08Z
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.description.abstractThe concepts of self-efficacy and collective efficacy have both been used by scholars to explain involvement in individual-level crime. Scholars have found that both types of efficacy are related to crime at the individual level. However, little research has examined the relationship between self-efficacy and collective efficacy and its influence on youths' involvement in crime. Using the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) data, this study focuses on the independent influences of self-efficacy and collective efficacy on involvement in crime among youths ages 9 to 19, and examines the potential moderating effect of collective efficacy on the relationship between self-efficacy and crime. The relationship between self-efficacy, collective efficacy, and crime is addressed by asking three questions. First, does a general measure of youth's self-efficacy influence their involvement in crime? Second, does a macro level measure of collective efficacy influence youths' involvement in crime? Third, does collective efficacy moderate the relationship between self-efficacy and crime? To control for the contexts in which youths live and individual-level factors that can influence involvement in crime, and may influence efficacy, neighborhood context, family context, and individual-level demographic variables are also examined. Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling, the analyses indicate mixed support for a relationship between efficacy and individual-level involvement in crime. First, a significant negative relationship exists between self-efficacy and crime. Second, no significant effects emerge between collective efficacy and crime. Third, collective efficacy completely moderates the relationship between self-efficacy and crime, but not in the expected direction. After controlling for collective efficacy, the significant negative relationship between self-efficacy and crime is nullified. The conclusion then is that a general measure of self-efficacy influences a youth's involvement in crime, while a macro level measure of collective efficacy does not. Areas of future research and implications for theory and policy are discussed.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/10312
dc.subject.pqcontrolledSociology, Criminology and Penologyen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledPsychology, Socialen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledSociology, Social Structure and Developmenten_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledcollective efficacyen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledcriminologyen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledPHDCNen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledself-efficacyen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledsocial psychologyen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledsocial structureen_US
dc.titleInvestigating the Relationship Between Micro and Macro Levels of Efficacy and Their Effects on Crimeen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Ahlin_umd_0117E_11144.pdf
Size:
1.03 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

UMD Theses and Dissertations
Criminology & Criminal Justice Theses and Dissertations