Using CRISPR/Cas9 to functionally dissect Blimp1, a newly identified pair-rule gene in the hemipteran Oncopeltus fasciatus

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Files

Reding_umd_0117E_24168.pdf (5.68 MB)
(RESTRICTED ACCESS)
No. of downloads:

Publication or External Link

Date

2024

Citation

Abstract

Genetic screens in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster identified a class of mutants displaying half as many segments as seen in wild type fly larvae (Nüsslein-Volhard and Wieschaus 1980). Careful examination of the larval cuticle revealed that one out of every two segments were deleted across the anterior-posterior (AP) axis, an unexpected phenotype suggesting that segmentation in Drosophila follows a ‘pair rule’. Thanks in part to the many genetic tools available for this model species, we now have a clear picture of how the AP axis of the Drosophila embryo is polarized and subsequently divided into distinct segments, and how the pair-rule genes (PRGs) define alternate segments during this process. Since all insects share a similar body plan, it is reasonable to expect that the processes regulating establishment of this body plan would be conserved. However, studies of the Drosophila segmentation gene orthologs in non-model insects suggest that this is not always the case. While the use of model organisms enables an unmatched depth of understanding of the mechanisms underlying development, it comes at the expense of understanding the diversity of these mechanisms across taxa. The milkweed bug Oncopeltus fasciatus (Ofas) (Hemiptera) is a particularly useful insect to study in this regard, as none of the orthologs of the Drosophila PRGs have clear PR-function in this species (Liu and Kaufman 2005b; Auman and Chipman 2018; Reding et al. 2019), while the gene E75A, which has no role in segmentation in Drosophila, is expressed in a PR pattern and its knockdown yields PR segmentation defects (Erezyilmaz et al. 2009). These results suggested that PR-regulation of segmentation in Oncopeltus might require a different set of factors than those discovered in Drosophila. To identify other non-canonical PRGs in this species, I conducted an expression pattern-based screen of transcription factor-encoding genes that are co-expressed with E75A during embryogenesis, and have identified the gene Blimp1 as an Oncopeltus PRG. Like the Drosophila PR mutants, Ofas-Blimp1 mutants display loss of alternate segments across the AP axis. No roles of Blimp1 in insect segmentation had been identified prior to this finding. This result suggests that while insect segmentation may be constrained to follow a pair rule, the genes responsible for regulating PR-segmentation are evolutionarily labile. Further, a major barrier to studying gene function in non-models is the lack of genetic tools such as visible markers and established methods for gene editing. Here I will describe deployment of CRISPR/Cas9 technology in Oncopeltus for targeted mutagenesis. While mutation of the ABC transporter-encoding gene white proved to be recessive lethal, I was able to generate a viable visible marker line by disrupting the X-linked gene Ofas-vermilion (v). Of-v is required for production of dark brown eye pigments, thus Ofas-v mutants have bright red eyes, easily discernible from the black eyes of wild type bugs. I show that a co-CRISPR approach using Of-v as a marker of germline mutation is a helpful strategy to identify mutations of interest at unlinked loci, enabling many future genetic manipulations in this species.

Notes

Rights