dc.contributor.author	Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA)
dc.date.accessioned	2010-06-24T18:57:41Z
dc.date.available	2010-06-24T18:57:41Z
dc.date.issued	2003-02-21
dc.description.abstract	A new PIPA/Knowledge Networks poll shows the American public is highly conflicted about whether the United Nations should strengthen inspections or authorize an invasion of Iraq. Steven Kull, director of the Program on International Policy Attitudes at the University of Maryland, comments that “Most of the discussion of Iraq is based on the premise that the US is champing at the bit to invade Iraq, while other members of the UN Security Council want to continue with inspections. However, a very large portion of the American public is having this very debate within their own minds.”	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/1903/10192
dc.language.iso	en_US	en_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAt	Digital Repository at the University of Maryland
dc.relation.isAvailableAt	University of Maryland (College Park, Md)
dc.subject	United Nations	en_US
dc.subject	Security Council	en_US
dc.subject	Iraq	en_US
dc.subject	Inspections	en_US
dc.title	Americans on Iraq and the UN Inspections: Public Conflicted Whether UN Should Strengthen Inspections or Authorize Invasion	en_US
dc.type	Article	en_US

Americans on Iraq and the UN Inspections: Public Conflicted Whether UN Should Strengthen Inspections or Authorize Invasion

Files