Children’s Evaluations of Ingroup and Outgroup Members Following Accusations of Wrongdoing

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorKillen, Melanie
dc.contributor.authorAckerman, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorD'Esterre, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorGlidden, Jacqueline
dc.contributor.authorButler, Luke
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-26T20:44:27Z
dc.date.available2020-04-26T20:44:27Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractChildren are commonly involved in competitive activities that can result in misunderstands because of differing interpretations of ambiguous situations. This study investigates if the group identity of children affects their interpretation of ambiguous situations when there is an accusation of misconduct. The results support the hypothesis because there was a divergence of evaluations based on team membership following an accusation of cheating.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13016/sthc-qvmp
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/25886
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtMaryland Center for Undergraduate Research
dc.relation.isAvailableAtDigital Repository at the University of Maryland
dc.relation.isAvailableAtUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md)
dc.subjectHuman Developmenten_US
dc.subjectEDUCen_US
dc.subjectAckermanen_US
dc.subjectMSSen_US
dc.subjectGroup identityen_US
dc.subjectCompetitionen_US
dc.subjectFairnessen_US
dc.titleChildren’s Evaluations of Ingroup and Outgroup Members Following Accusations of Wrongdoingen_US
dc.typePresentationen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
AckermanMSSposter.pdf
Size:
1.01 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download

Collections

Undergraduate Research Day 2020