Comparative Efficacy of Common Active Ingredients in Organic Insecticides Against Difficult to Control Insect Pests

dc.contributor.authorDively, Galen P.
dc.contributor.authorPatton, Terrence
dc.contributor.authorBarranco, Lindsay
dc.contributor.authorKulhanek, Kelly
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-08T16:50:26Z
dc.date.available2023-11-08T16:50:26Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-08
dc.description.abstractThere exists a lack of control efficacy information to enable decision-making about which organic insecticide product works best for a given insect pest. Here, we summarize results of 153 field trials on the control efficacy of common active ingredients in organic insecticides against 12 groups of the most difficult to control insect pests. These trials evaluated primarily the organic products Entrust (spinosad), Azera (pyrethrin and azadirachtin), PyGanic (pyrethrin) and Neemix (azadirachtin), which reduced pest infestations by an overall 73.9%, 61.7%, 48.6% and 46.1% respectively, averaged across all trials. Entrust was the most effective control option for many insect pests, particularly providing >75% control of flea beetles, Colorado potato beetle, cabbageworms and alfalfa weevil, but was relatively ineffective against true bugs and aphids. Azera provided >75% control of green peach aphid, flea beetles, Japanese beetle, Mexican bean beetle, potato leafhopper and cabbageworms. PyGanic was less effective than Entrust and Azera but still provided >75% control of green peach aphid, flea beetles and potato leafhopper. The growth inhibition effects of azadirachtin in Neemix were particularly effective against larvae of Mexican bean beetle and Colorado potato beetle but was generally less effective in trials with insect infestations consisting mainly of adult stages. Those insect pests that were particularly difficult to control included thrips, stinkbugs, cucumber beetles and fruitworms. Several caveats pertaining to the application of the results are discussed.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/insects11090614
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13016/dspace/bqpe-tjcj
dc.identifier.citationDively, G.P.; Patton, T.; Barranco, L.; Kulhanek, K. Comparative Efficacy of Common Active Ingredients in Organic Insecticides Against Difficult to Control Insect Pests. Insects 2020, 11, 614.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/31315
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.isAvailableAtDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_us
dc.relation.isAvailableAtEntomologyen_us
dc.relation.isAvailableAtCollege of Computer, Mathematical & Natural Sciencesen_us
dc.relation.isAvailableAtUniversity of Maryland (College Park, MD)en_us
dc.subjectorganic insecticide
dc.subjectcontrol efficacy
dc.subjectspinosad
dc.subjectpyrethrin
dc.subjectazadirachtin
dc.titleComparative Efficacy of Common Active Ingredients in Organic Insecticides Against Difficult to Control Insect Pests
dc.typeArticle
local.equitableAccessSubmissionNo

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
insects-11-00614-v2.pdf
Size:
3.26 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.55 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: