“Scholarship is a Conversation”: Discourse, Attribution, and Twitter’s Role in Information Literacy Instruction
| dc.contributor.author | Carroll, Alexander J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dasler, Robin | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-03-12T14:41:02Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-03-12T14:41:02Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015-03-11 | |
| dc.description.abstract | When addressing scholarly attribution, citation, and plagiarism in one-shot instruction sessions, librarians often fail to present these issues in a manner that has relevance for students. Librarians often focus on intellectual honesty and the potential ramifications of plagiarism, both individual pursuits, rather than explaining that by creating an academic work, students are participating in academic discourse. Within Pluralizing Plagiarism, Anson argues that scholarly attribution instruction that emphasizes “policy, detection, and punishment” is antithetical to the mission of institutions of higher learning – the education of students (Anson, 2008). One of the major deficiencies of this compliance-based instruction is that it presents students with a false dichotomy that does not align with their authentic life experiences; plagiarism is demonstrated as a black and white issue, rather than existing in shades of gray. Students who have come of age within a twenty-first century information ecosystem rife with remix and parody culture will likely find teaching that presents the re-use of source material as a non-nuanced issue unconvincing. Because students respond positively to instruction that aligns with their authentic experiences, this suggests that librarians need to develop new methods for teaching attribution and scholarly discourse that not only recognize the nuance inherent to these topics, but also presents these concepts within a familiar framework (Klipfel, 2014). As a familiar platform for social interaction with multiple avenues for giving credit and a shorter timescale, Twitter presents an opportunity to place attribution, plagiarism, and integrity into a humanizing, real world context that models how discourse unfolds in an authentic manner for learners. By embedding attribution instruction into a meaningful context, librarians and other educators can make substantial and much needed improvements to traditional compliance-based instruction, which is often built upon the slow, rigid, and unfamiliar patterns of how to cite scholarly works. | en_US |
| dc.identifier | https://doi.org/10.13016/M2N32B | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Carroll, Alexander J. and Robin Dasler. (2015). “’Scholarship is a Conversation’: Discourse, Attribution, and Twitter’s Role in Information Literacy Instruction.” The Journal of Creative Library Practice. Retrieved from http://creativelibrarypractice.org/2015/03/11/scholarship-is-a-conversation/ | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2330-4227 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1903/16326 | |
| dc.publisher | The Journal of Creative Library Practice | en_US |
| dc.relation.isAvailableAt | Digital Repository at the University of Maryland | en_us |
| dc.relation.isAvailableAt | University of Maryland Libraries | en_us |
| dc.relation.isAvailableAt | University of Maryland (College Park, MD) | en_us |
| dc.subject | en_US | |
| dc.subject | information literacy | en_US |
| dc.subject | academic libraries | en_US |
| dc.subject | scholarly communication | en_US |
| dc.subject | plagiarism | en_US |
| dc.subject | attribution | en_US |
| dc.title | “Scholarship is a Conversation”: Discourse, Attribution, and Twitter’s Role in Information Literacy Instruction | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |