Send in the Reserves! The Development and Significance of the Reserve Dilemma in Military History

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorSumida, Jon Ten_US
dc.contributor.authorChadwick, Andrew Lewisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentHistoryen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-07T05:48:01Z
dc.date.available2021-07-07T05:48:01Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation examines the origins and evolution of the trained reserve—a 19th-century military institution that most states continue to depend upon for national defense. In doing so, it argues that the rising complexity, speed, and lethality of warfare over the last century challenged the viability of industrial era reservist personnel and training policies, which many states retain today. Such policies have largely proven incapable of providing reservists with the time and resources to keep up with changing technical and tactical character of warfare, as evidenced by the poor performance of many reservists in the conflicts of the past century. However, armies preparing for large-scale combat operations generally could not reduce their reliance on reservists because of a combination of political, military, and socio-economic constraints and compulsions. Namely, they lacked the financial means, military resources, and, in some cases, the political capital to rely solely on full-time soldiers who often are better resourced to keep up with the rising complexity of modern warfare compared to part-time reservists.Thus, as this dissertation reveals using archival sources, recently declassified intelligence reports, and a host of other printed primary sources, armies confronted a dilemma regarding reserve policy over the past century. They could, as the U.S. Army has done since the 1970s, increase reserve training standards, but risk incurring higher overhead costs or sparking a political backlash from reservists who often resisted efforts to increase their service obligations. Alternatively, they could reduce their dependency on reservists, as the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have done since the late 1980s. But doing this threatened to overstretch active duty units who, as this dissertation shows, generally cannot fight protracted or large-scale wars without reservists. In short, this dissertation shows how the dynamics of reserve policymaking and the combat performance of reservists can—and often had—significant political, strategic, operational, and tactical effects throughout recent history.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13016/bg03-2gfh
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/27314
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledMilitary historyen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledInternational relationsen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledMilitary studiesen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledArmy Reserveen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledIsrael Defense Forceen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledIsrael Defense Forcesen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledNational Guarden_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledReserveen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledReservistsen_US
dc.titleSend in the Reserves! The Development and Significance of the Reserve Dilemma in Military Historyen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Chadwick_umd_0117E_21464.pdf
Size:
2.97 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

UMD Theses and Dissertations
History Theses and Dissertations